• Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    epstein files distraction. with iran war going badly, and the things like the jean E carroll settlement, he needed it.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I applaude the sentiment, but should say “cropped out of” since “edited” sounds like they had to use the clone tool to remove him from the center of the frame and spent more than 2 seconds removing him. Here’s an pic from a different angle showing Trump way off to the right side of the frame:

    Update: Just watched the video and Trump clearly tries to insert himself into the shot, and would have been in frame, but is escorted out of the frame, after which the photo is taken and cropped.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      2 days ago

      Looks like he’s in his “floating over to a freshly baked pie” pose once again

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve never understood that, it’s so weird. People say it’s because he wears lifts and I don’t doubt he does, and women wearing heels do stick out their butt but they also arch their back to keep their balance. Which lifts the boobs, another plus, but it’s mostly for balance. (Source: am woman, have tested the different effects of 4" heels and 4" platforms with a 2" rise toe-to-heel)

        Maybe he’s trained himself to “not stand like a girl in heels” and thinks he’s getting away with it? Or maybe his back is unable to arch? The belly weight is the opposite of a counterbalance so that’s not it. Could his cankles be incredibly strong shin muscles? No, Michael Jackson had skinny ankles.

        It’s a mystery, Scoob!

        Edit, new theory: Diaper as counterweight

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wow he really does stick out like a sore thumb for all the wrong reasons. Everyone else there has so much energy with the leaning tower of shitstack off to the right. He’s not even looking at the celebration it seems.

      • subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats because this whole celebration is about him. He is the celebration. Should he not bask in the glory that would not have happened but for him?

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cropping is editing. You can edit a photo in many many ways including cropping

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes but the way it’s phrased with no context is (intentionally) misleading, and doesn’t help describe how it was edited and to what extent. I have to assume that they used “edited” to be technically correct while maximizing clicks/engagement. One might read the sentence and think the Spain National Team had taken the time to aggressively remove Trump from the picture, as if he was in front of a player and they had to airbrush him out. That’s what I thought at first but searching for an uncropped image shows that wasn’t the case, and this context helped me understand what “edited” referred to, and I figured others might want the context as well.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t agree there was anything misleading in this usage. I think you are reading too much into it.

          I understand the difference you are describing, but I don’t accept that the use of Edited was in anyway click bait, in this instance.

          We are just so used to it being used that way it easy to forget to give the benefit of the doubt.

          I could be wrong though, but it doesn’t feel right to me to have issue with this use of language

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am confused; couldn’t they take two separate pictures? One with Trump (and possibly the Spanish king) and one with just the team.

      • Mokopa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why take one with trump at all? He’s just a politician from one of the host nations. No other hosts have acted like this, they respect that the moment belongs to the team. FFS even Infantino can understand that.

      • banause@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why? He is just an elected representative of a bunch of people that have no association with the FIFA or Spain.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          By this logic he shouldn’t have been there to hand out medals. The game was played in his country. It’s not so strange to take a picture with a government representative in this kind of occasions.

            • ranzispa@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              2 days ago

              It may be not true, I do not care too much. I just said it would not be strange to take several pictures in an occasion such as that. Whether it is customary to do so or not, I do not know.

              • BigPotato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                You openly admit to not knowing if it’s customary, i.e not strange, but also claim that it would not be strange. You defeat yourself in one post.

                Please consider that the world of football didn’t start in 2026 and that your amount of knowledge is irrelevant to what the actual customs are.

                • ranzispa@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  We misunderstand ourselves. I mean on large occasions it is normal to have photo shoots, I don’t know whether it is common in football events. I would not be surprised if it was and wouldn’t consider it strange.

                  I’m not trying to make a point here, there’s nothing to defeat or be defeated about.

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Everybody too stupid to see those are two different photos. Nothing cropped, nothing edited, just one photographer was paid by FIFA and the other not.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I never said this was the original photo. I said it’s one from a different angle showing Trump way off to the right side of the frame at the same time the official FIFA one was taken.

        • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I wasn’t addressing you by that, but everybody else who fails to see it and you clearly saw there is a difference.

  • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interesting that when the male team wins the World Cup, nobody tries to kiss the captain on the mouth.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          There were widespread calls for Rubiales’ resignation and structural change in the RFEF, paired with support for Jenni Hermoso – the player he had forcibly kissed on the lips at the final , and whom the RFEF was accused of mistreating following the incident – in Spain and from women’s football teams around the world. The social movement caused by Rubiales’ conduct and continued public denials of wrongdoing has been described as Spain’s #MeToo movement; it quickly assumed the name #SeAcabó (lit. ‘It’s over’), from a tweet posted by Alexia Putellas after Rubiales’ speech. Previous attempts by players using collective action to force improvements in the conditions of women’s football in Spain have been either ignored or given outward but not systemic change.

          The general unity of Spanish society in criticising Rubiales – including politicians from across the political spectrum – was considered unprecedented, as was the support of women’s football from men’s football players and teams. Rubiales subsequently resigned as president on 10 September 2023, later being banned from football-related activities for three years. A criminal complaint relating to alleged coercion is also being investigated.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    He was there because he is constitutionally incapable of not making himself the center of everything around him. He’s like a black hole made out of poop. So like, a brown hole.

  • varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dear US Americans, the world cannot comprehend that this stain is still in office. It’s baffling that so many people still accept what he’s doing.

    • statmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more baffling that the rest of the world can’t see how many of us are fighting and getting the shit kicked out of us.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Many either don’t see it (they only watch our media snippets), or don’t care to support it.

        They just want to complain on the internet when something becomes inconvenient for them personally.

        Most of these people are cowards, like the person that downvoted you. Many even help Trump by minimizing and belittling those resisting Trump to a portrayal of non-existance.

        These people are little more than useful idiots for the GOP.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Remember the huge demonstrations in the US against Obama for his campaign of assassinating people with drones?!

          Me neither.

          Because there weren’t any.

          From the outside the impression that passes is that the reason that a lot of Americans are against this POTUS whilst not having been against previous ones is that he brought to America the Fascism that America practiced or supported abroad. In other words, before it was “I’m alright Jack” for those people, but now they themselves are not alright anymore so and THAT is what’s unnacceptable for them.

          The imperialist mindset in the US hasn’t changed, the delusions of grandeur and the feeling of inherent superiority are barelly reduced if at all - America fucking up people all over the place is fine as long as it only does it in far away places to little people who aren’t Americans, ideally somebody you’ve been told by TV are “bad people” (whilst Americans are “good”, they’re always the “good guys”, even when they leave hundreds of thousands of bodies in their trail)

          American Exceptionalism has mainly just made a massive pile of bones and that feeling of “better and more important than the rest” hasn’t changed and the focus of people demonstrating against Trump in the US isn’t at all ending such posture and the consequences of it in the World, rather it’s just ending the problems Trump is causing to America and Americans: good for you if you’re fighting for what’s good for you, just don’t expect other people to think better of you for that alone when you don’t and never really cared enough about all the shit that’s been done in your name by the leaders of your country fucking up everybody else.

          In fact, expecting to be aplauded for it by the rest of the World sounds a lot like the usual delusions of grandeur.

          The only people in the US I myself respect in all this shit are the ones demonstrating against things like what’s happenning in Palestine - they’re standing by genuine principles and fighting for others, not themselves - not the people merely fighting Trump for what he’s doing to America, since that’s just self-serving, not principled.

          • Furbag@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            From the outside the impression that passes is that the reason that a lot of Americans are against this POTUS whilst not having been against previous ones is that he brought to America the Fascism that America practiced or supported abroad.

            Fascism is just imperialism turned inward.

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It may feel to you that when you’re with your people everyone is against Trump. From the outside looking in, there are more people who support Trump than oppose him, and there are many times more people who are in neither camp and just accept that this is what the world is. That vast majority of Americans think that democracy only happens once every four years.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Who’s fighting and getting the shit kicked out of them? Any source?

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most of the cases of ICE brutality escalate through protests against them. The protestors know that raising violence will be used as an excuse to America’s fear/racism-driven base to triple their funding. They bravely accept they’ll do more in getting attacked, in demonstrating ICE’s cruelty, than attacking individuals.

          We’re in a bizarre period of history where there’s so many eyes on the internet, optics matter more than ever. There’s still some extremely captive audiences that can be made to think everything the regime does is “legitimate”.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They don’t understand nuances, the law, the Constitution, our election system, etc. They want to see us destroy the world for their own entertainment. Ignore them, we have work to do, and we’re doing it. Next stop is the Midterm Elections.

        Then it’s two years of fun investigations and criminal prosecutions.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hahahaha your system is so broken. The fact you can’t see it is kind of sad. Maybe they lose the midterms but your limp noodle Democrats are not going to do shit.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because you aren’t.

        Sorry you think you are fighting, but you aren’t and it’s exhausting

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s more like 50.0001% when looking at most polls.

        “Reports say an ICE agent pulled a 6 year old child, a US citizen, out of a car and beat him to within an inch of his life, and then pissed on him. Then stripped his clothes off and fucked him. Then, he mailed shrapnel bombs to every one of the child’s friends.

        51% of those surveyed said they felt that ICE’s actions were excessive.”

        My unending madness comes from failing to understand that demonic 49%.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some Americans most either support him or don’t care.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Your entire country wishes they could have someone walk up their driveway so they could murder them. Because their second amendment.

            So go fucking use your 2A rights and fucking do something about the fascist regime taking over your country.

            Otherwise turn your guns over and shut the fuck up because your country is either gonna nut up and defend itself over an invasion of fascism or you’re all a bunch of pussies.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m waiting to see what happens November through January. If this can be solved at the ballot box, that would be for the best.

          If not, we may have to start learning more about the intricacies of Minecraft.

          • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It would be yeah. I’m not confident but I hope it’s held and a fair one. Either way people need to get out to it and help those who can’t.

            The only other way is peaceful shutdown. There’s nothing else…they can’t civil war their way out of it, that’d just be worse. A bloodbath which would fail and tear the country apart irreparably. There might be an argument for splitting, it isn’t through war.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re the country that masturbates to gun violence and the rights to own them. Something about having them to fight tyranny or something.

            So own up. What the fuck is the point of your 2nd amendment if you’re gonna pussy out when it matters most?

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              So own up. What the fuck is the point of your 2nd amendment

              You’re asking the wrong person, I think that amendment is fucking bullshit

            • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, let’s be realistic.

              I know, it’s frustrating, for years they, including the progressives, have taken shots at us about the rules our governments have because we don’t have guns. I absolutely get it. I’ve had them going at me for two days because I’ve pointed out they are where they are because they fail to vote. They expect and get a lot of passes they don’t offer others.

              Truth is, they can’t go out and do civil war, they know it and so do we when we think about it. There’s enough to be critical about and yeah they get the shits when the mirrors held up and they’re fucking irresponsible but going the violent path isn’t their answer.

              They need to do peaceful shutdown. I know there’s a few of them out there trying to put a plan to this, I’ve seen the discussions around here and other places. That’s their only solution now. 60% in the urban areas would be enough, in two weeks to a month they’d have senators, congress and half decent billionaires moving to act on it.

              Unless they do get another fair vote…if they do, they need to get out in numbers, including helping and organising those who find it difficult to vote. Even if it’s a workday. A life is more important than a job and that’s where they’re at right now.

              • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your entire country for as long as I have lived for nearly four decades have masturbated over “the right to bear arms” and you can just shoot people whenever you want and guns guns guns.

                Now when you’re actually presented with an authoritarian regime, you want to pull all the “yeah but except…”

                Your entire country is full of cowards and pussies. You spent decades leaning into your second amendment and when push finally comes to shove and you’re faced with a fascist government and police mudering your own citizens in the streets, it’s" umm actually that’s not how the second amendment works".

                America is a country of pussies.

                • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yeah…I’m not an American mate, you might be using an app which doesn’t tell you where I’m from

                  My comment however should have been enough to tell you I’m not an American

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yet you hear the same garbage being touted here too. “If we tax the ultra rich they’ll leave and take the jobbies with them.”

          I had no idea they’d up and move all the societal infrastructure if we decide to finally have them pay their fair share. How exactly are they supposed to plop out the hospitals, schools, roads, power lines, pipes, sewers, […] with them?

          It’s election year here, and I have no hope whatsoever that things will change.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Here in California, the threat to emigrate is totally a bluff. Our economy is big enough that corporations would lose too much business trying to avoid our state. In fact, the robust system of California institutions and regulatory agencies are exactly why the technology industry has continued to stay here (and not, say, move to Texas, where they’d be taxed less). Billionaires want to be able to live here and have property here and do business here.

            If they really want to try to pull up stakes and move to North Dakota (or Argentina – also good riddance) it means having to sell off their assets here, and the assets will stay and be taxable no matter what billionaire owns them.

            Instead, I expect they’ll hire lobbyists by the dozens to beleaguer our representatives to try to kill those bills or at least insert workarounds. Or they’ll try to do what the farming coalitions are trying to do, and pass federal legislation that stops California from regulating industry.

            Fun story, the ISPs got together to kill net neutrality regulation at the Federal level, and so in 2018 California passed a net neutrality gold standard, which meant that ISPs had to adhere to those regulations for all traffic going in and out of California, which made it really difficult for them to segregate traffic that didn’t go through the state.

            It’s election year here, and I have no hope whatsoever that things will change.

            Trump and the Republican party seem determined to make sure things only get progressively worse. So far they’ve been really incompetent about it, but I don’t know how big the voting bloc is that is under the thrall of their propaganda. If there are enough MAGA loyalists, if they can successfully suppress enough votes, if gerrymandering works to win more Republican seats, if the administration is able to capture voter rolls and start caging votes nationwide, then yeah, nothing will change and we’re all going to be skipping meals and losing weight.

            After that, I expect it to take months or even years before the public collectively decides it has nothing left to lose.

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              If there are enough MAGA loyalists, if they can successfully suppress enough votes, if gerrymandering works to win more Republican seats, if the administration is able to capture voter rolls and start caging votes nationwide, then yeah, nothing will change and we’re all going to be skipping meals and losing weight.

              I mean, yeah, I hope all that works out in favour of change because I’m sick and tired of the U.S. fucking around on the world stage screwing with the rest of us. The current administration needs to go. It shouldn’t have made it in in the first place. Hell, I’m still astonished he made it in 2016.

              When I said that it’s election year here, I didn’t mean the U.S. I’m not American. I live in a U.S. wannabe country, that my entire life has aspired to be like big daddy America. Some people are finally disillusioned, but I don’t think it’ll be enough. I worry we’re too far gone.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That creepy weirdo having been chosen by Americans as their leader is totally destroying whatever impression there still was of the US as a great and advanced country.

      The perception of people outside of the US is mostly shaped by what they see on TV (since they neither live in America and experience day-to-day life there, nor are they likely to know Americans) and a creepy guy like that as president just passed the impression of America as a backwards place filled with backwards people.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    The whole thing looked like a mix of the cringiest of Micheal Scott mixed with a “that was just one moment when we knew he should be in a home” story.

    So fucking cringe.

  • Amdouni@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Something tells me that this image will be used in the future to teach about Trump’s history, something like Hitler in the Olympics.