At least one Kansas district is projecting $150,000 to $180,000 just to equip secondary students with individual phone lockers, according to the Wichita Eagle. The state provided zero dedicated funding. Every dollar comes from local budgets.

Districts choosing fabric locking pouches — think Yondr, the magnetic-lock system concert venues use to keep audiences present — face an estimated $30 per unit. Statewide, the Kansas Division of the Budget put that figure at roughly $13.4 million if every student received one, according to the Lawrence KS Times. Lockers require a steeper upfront investment. Neither option came with a state check attached.

Legislators passed the policy. The price tag was someone else’s problem.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    They could just leave them at home. I mean that worked just fine literally forever until these last two generations.

    But, since both parents and kids are now addicted to the damn things, no one can imagine not having one in their hand for more than five minutes.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Worked so well, let’s avoid looking at the states of the world… Just install parental control and look the phone during their school time like a fucking responsible parent…

        • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Seem legit, didn’t take in account that kid dont’ hâve a fully developed brain and capitalists know that and exploit that. Sure be a good parent and let capitalist pedo teach your kids without supervisions, what a great idea.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I tought people computers for some time. As long as there is some motivation, you can teach an 80 years old violin teacher to patch Linux drivers and recompile kernel.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It worked, but not well. I remember standing in line for 20 minutes waiting on the one phone to call my parents so they knew my after school activity was done. (while other students were calling their parents).

    • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      When your phone is your GPS and radio, no. I was in band, and some days we wouldn’t leave school afterwards because we’d be going to a game across the state. After the game, my mom would want to know where I was, which was usually Waffle House with a dozen others.

  • moendopi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t know if I am supposed to be angry about this or not. Someone tell me if I’m supposed to be angry!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Schools are scared to death of kids recording their staff being stupid, and each other. Legal liability/parental outrage. They block both phones and smart watches. If it were just a usage problem, they could have done what we always do and only take things away when they’re an issue.

      Since the advent of phones, this hasn’t been a real problem.

      My son’s school collects them at the classroom door if they have them out, or ignores it if they’re in their bag as long as they don’t make noise. - free

      Kansas, who is already horrible at maintaining educational budgets to a self-destructive degree wants to spend 150k of (likely unwilling) taxpayer money to provide fancy lockers for phones that could be solved by leave it in your bag and off, if we find it on or it makes noise, you get detention.

      It’s a stupid waste or resources and time.

      if 0 is the Byrds Turn Turn Turn and 10 is RaTM bulls on parade, maybe go 6 or 7

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s likely also plain corruption, just lawmakers creating ways for their friends to siphon money from government budgets with useless gadgets like this.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Seems like a straightforward solution to a simple problem. Pretty direct correlation with kids having access to smartphones vs declining grades and attention spans.

      In schools that have started simply not allowing phones in class, grades have improved. This seems like the next logical step. Its basically just returning to pre-smartphone days. Schools used to confiscate phones if you had them out at all during school hours.

      People will disagree with simple solutions, but those are often the ones that works. Phones cause problems, get rid of phones. Simple and direct.

      • moendopi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Whoa whoa whoa now. Whoa. That is an entirely too reasonable take. No conspiracy, no blaming capitalism or someone trying to scam and grift. Just a reasonable take. Hmmph, I am disappoint. I have nothing to be angry about now. Hmmph!

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Are there any studies that link phone use inside schools to those issues? Because I can easily believe that declining grades could be attributed towards the use of tablets and laptops being used in classrooms as well which many schools are encouraging or increasing the use of.

        As for attention spans I would believe it’s for the use of phones/tablets/electronics from a young age rather than the use of them inside of a school itself.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean I’ve seen a lot more money wasted on much dumber shit.

    Kids aren’t going to learn if they’ve got handheld social media internet gaming consoles with them in school. I wouldn’t have. They’re not going to willingly put them away for hours every day. I wouldn’t have. So…lock the fuckers up. These kids need to be educated so I’m not being taken care of by drooling Idiocracy background actors when I’m in end-of-life care. There’s way too much stupid going around already.

    To be clear, 180k is too much. I’m just saying I agree with locking the goddamn things up.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      “If you take your phone out you get detention.” I don’t see why this doesn’t work anymore. Do parents have no control over their kids anymore? You get detention twice, 3rd time suspended, suspended twice 3rd time expelled. If I got suspended from school for taking my phone out my parents would have simply taken away the phone.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t see why this doesn’t work anymore. Do parents have no control over their kids anymore?

        I think you just answered your own question.

        Clearly we’ve reached the stage of physically taking and locking their phones up during school hours because verbal threats weren’t working. If parents had control of what their kids were doing when not in close proximity to them, this wouldn’t be happening.

        Lot of dumb adults out there these days. I think a lot of parents would be on the “but I need to contact them in case of emergencies” and “you’re threatening my child’s rights” boat if they just floated the idea of suspension for phone use. So now we’re at the physically confiscate them upon entering like contraband stage.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I need to contact them in case of an emergency doesn’t mean the phone is out. Also the only emergency that matters is if the kid is in danger and needs to call someone. If Dad falls down a flight of stairs and breaks his neck you either A, go pick the kid up from school or B tell him when he gets out of school. The kid isn’t a paramedic.

          Also kids don’t have rights at school. That’s why they have the ability to search all their lockers, backpacks, and vehicles without a warrant.

          There is no law that says you have a right to have your phone in your hand, or it would be illegal to seperate us from them to go through metal detectors and such at airports, courts, etc

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            An emergency means the kids needs to call 911 not the parents need to contact the student. Most schools have a phone/intercom in each classroom which is close enough though. (Back in my day we did have to use this once when something happened, the teacher dealt with the main issue and assigned a student to push the button to alert the office. I wasn’t in that class so I don’t recall details)

            If dad has hours to live you call the school office - you will need to sign them out anyway so they need to know. (plus they need to know because the school has counselors trained dealing with emotional issues like this who need to be at that school when the kid returns).

            Which is to say I can think of no reason a kid needs a phone during class hours. They are sometimes useful after school hours.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          So what do you do if the kid doesn’t lock up their phone at the start of the day and has it in class?

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Kids have no hope these days. Who gives a shit if you get detention? It won’t change your future.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Getting expelled from a school most definitely should effect your future. Alternative schools have never been known to be fun. They also don’t usually have buses that come near you, so parents are going to hate having to drive you there, and if they aren’t going you wind up in a situation where the kid gets taken by child protective services, and that’s not a system that has great futures for kids either.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Caring about future wasn’t that popular among kids anyway, but when everyone kinda accepts that the future should be sacrificed on an altar of a line going up, it’s even harder to care. We’re going to burn last available resources and warm planet until we can’t grow crops anymore, so we can generate bad videos of Will Smith eating spaghetti. Who the fuck cares about long division or mitochondria when the most popular occupation in 2050 is projected to be “water refugee”.
            Sure, it’s a doom scenario, it’s not guaranteed, we can somehow persevere, humanity always does. And even in the doom scenario It’s not impossible that we’ll conserve the civilization in some form.
            What we have lost forever is the trust of our kids, that ship has sailed. When Greta Thunberg asked us not to destroy the planet, the collective response was mockery, anger, and pedo threats. There is a generational disdain bigger than it was for boomers.

          • jnod4@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            You still can work in an amazon warehouse with or without school, same like most basic entry jobs. When kids realise the market is dead and no amount of education will provide a career they will stop caring.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              The job market is not dead. It is slightly down, but there are still a lot of jobs. There have been recessions before. History supports the idea that there will be a recovery in the near future, and then a few more years latter another recession.

              Of course if you are the person without a job it does suck. However for the majority things are okay.

              • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                History never had the threat of a warming climate. A child starting school now will finish high school in what, 2038? We’ll be above 2 degrees warming by then. They’re in for a rough ride.

                • bluGill@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  History has always had some threat. The exact threat has changed over time, but there was always something.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I grew up with no portable electronics available at all, we also didn’t learn shit. If your topic is shit and your presentation is boring, kids would find how to ignore you. If it’s interesting, they will listen to you no matter how many smartphones they have. It’s hard, that’s for sure, but this infantilising bullshit makes it harder, not easier. You have to treat the kids like people, that’s the only way. Also you need to recognise that they aren’t adults, so you can’t expect them have hours of uninterrupted attention, smartphones or not.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why is 180k too much? I expect the school to be spending the money to buy something of quality that will last for a few years, and they likely have several thousand students. At $100 for each this would cover 1800 students. Even the $30 pouches mentioned only covers 6000 students - I would expect they have spares in each school.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is how the kids know they are not in an institution of learning, but a prison for the crime of being juvenile.

    What we’re also not going to hear is how often devices are misplaced, confiscated without return or just dissappear like socks in a dryer.

  • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    How does this work, are all students required to put a phone in the locker? What about kids who can’t afford a phone?

    And what about kids who get a second phone to put in the locker so they can keep their main phone?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      What about kids who can’t afford a phone?

      No phone = Nothing to deposit

      And what about kids who get a second phone to put in the locker so they can keep their main phone?

      Get rekt. Rules for the poor.

          • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Sooooo exactly what happened two decades ago with phones and gameboys? This is so stupid. I got my phone confiscated a few times in high school and had to pay the school $15 or wait 15 days to get it back. Why is this not an option anymore?

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Absolutely, yes.
              Had my phone rooted and it suddenly crashed and rebooted mid-class blasting Titanium by David Guetta at full volume for it’s boot sequence.
              I could get it back after the school day but I am still not over it >:(

              But yeah, just confiscate it and get it back after school is done.

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m seeing alot of comments about how this will or won’t work for how much the price is, but this made me think of something else.

    Don’t we give kids chromebooks/devices anyway. I assume the point of these lockers is to force kids to pay attention, but chromebooks are waaaaaay worst than any phone a parent gave them.

    You can threaten a kid to take their phone away, but you can almost argue you can’t take the chromebook away because that’s where all their assignments, tasks, books, notes, etc are all stored. And from my experience, people were always goofing off on other sites or playing games. Unless the school is able to monitor and lock down those chromebooks (which if we’re being honest, have the bare minimum of parental controls), then this is just throwing money at a fire instead of, I dunno, paying teachers better to actually help kids learn instead of moderating their tiktok addictions

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There are webfilters for all edu devices… Except Windows 11 SE and that’s because the hardware can’t even run the OS.

      But fr… At least Chromebooks are easy to lock down if gadmin and 3rd party filters are set up.

  • Bgugi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It doesnt look like returning the devices has to be immediate or convenient. Heres my proposed plan:

    Ban devices entirely. Any item discovered gets confiscated, labeled, and placed in a bin in the office (achieving the “secure” location requirement of the bill.) Students are permitted to label their item. Items are available for pickup weekly at the end of a district-wide midday “value of education” parental education session.

    Labelmaker: ~$200/school

    Labels: $0.01/item

    2 hrs labor weekly: 38×2×$50=$3800/district/year

    Value of inconveniencing parents enough to care: priceless.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Banning sexual assault, bulling, rape and pedophilia doesn’t work either. Source: my secondary school.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Look valid, crappy idea. So now the director is responsible if a child is stuck somewhere and can’t reach it’s parents while going to school or coming from school.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        They do it like me in ye olden days of the 2000s:

        • Alert the teacher
        • Go to the school secretary office and ask for the phone
        • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          That was before enshitification. They dropped pur kid at a random bus stop two weeks before the end os school, bus had issues, we had to go fetch them 2km away. They warned nobody and counted on kid to warn their parents… In this case you expect them to do what ?

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well in that case, you have to give the bus drivers rigorous training to reflect the cell phone policy. The bus driver absolutely should not have done that to your kid. That is not acceptable at all. However, that driver probably only did that because they knew your kid had a phone. If they instead knew that no kids in the school are allowed to have phones, they probably would never do something like that. It’s a giant legal liability for the bussing company.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I was expected to walk my own ass to school.
            I did it by foot and bike.
            And 2km is (depending on age) not much.

            A warning to impacted parents would be neat though.

            • Esp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It depends, really? 2km of well maintained sidewalks and walkable streets is very different from 2km of no sidewalks and unprotected highway crossings. The school I went to as a kid specifically banned walking home because we had the latter and a kid had got hit and killed because of it.