Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
Were they not aware of the refund policy when they listed their game for sale on the platform?
I guess they didn’t expect people to be such freeloading assholes to play their game in full and then take back their money.
That kind of dumb people are why we have to deal with huge exploitative game companies instead of having more indie devs
deleted by creator
Have they even given evidence that their game is significantly more refunded than any other game? Or did they see X amount of people refunding the game and declaring that they must have done it because they’re evil?
Well, yea. Giving great reviews and then refunding, as one example.
As if a good review alone was payment enough
Ah, yes, of course a single isolated example is indicative of an endemic issue /s
Single and isolated? You know that there are statistics about completion and play duration. It’s easy to see how many play it fully and THEN refund.
I wonder if the article says anything about that
So the dev is just whining on social media then because they’re an entitled prick.
Doubling down on the idiocy I see. You could have avoided see me like a prick for the second time if you would just read the the whole article rather than cherry picking a bit of it that reinforces whatever random point it is you’re trying to make.
Which I think is fair enough.
They claimed this is their stance, yet they’re calling on Valve to update their refund policy to not make it possible. That doesn’t add up.
Ironic