Without control of the White House, there is of course only so much Democrats can do with their newfound power. And in the context of the myriad horrors of the first half of President Donald Trump’s second term, talking about what the party “should” do next is roughly analogous to deciding which out-of-control forest fire to fight first: There is not enough water, there are lots of worthy candidates, and all of them are getting worse.

One thing must be true, though: Whatever issues Democratic lawmakers choose to focus on—and, as the 2028 ideas primary gets underway, whatever ambitious ideas Democratic presidential hopefuls choose to support—the party must also have a plan for taking on the Supreme Court, which remains an existential threat to anything Democrats might hope to accomplish. Even if the party is fortunate enough to win a trifecta—the House, the Senate, and the White House—in 2028, things like a Green New Deal and Medicare for All and a new Voting Rights Act do not stand a chance before this six-justice conservative supermajority. Regrettably, what I wrote in 2020 is just as true today: If Congress passes any one of these proposals into law, the only real question is which justice ends up writing the opinion that kills it.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.socialBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 day ago

        Impeachment of Supreme Court justices doesn’t involve the courts at all. It’s done solely through Congress.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            anything the shitstain doesn’t like also requires a two-thirds majority (of both chambers) to override his veto.

            the bar is slightly lower for impeachment, as laying the charges only requires simple majority in the house.

            • TWeaK@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes, but that’s even worse as it requires more Republican representatives to flip.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          SCOTUS settles numerous disputes and could, like they did in the early 2000s, change the outcome of contested elections. If they do so to those that may have the plan to impeach the court, there is little anyone can do to stop them. Therefore expanding the court first takes priority, to prevent the court from retaliation.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.socialBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You want to expand the Supreme Court before the next election?

            Tell me, who nominates Supreme Court justices for the Senate to vote on?

            • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 day ago

              You, specifically, are why I support reeducation camps for all Americans. Reading comprehension has gone downhill so rapidly since AI’s invention.

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                And you, specifically, are why the Iron Front wanted to shoot Marxists alongside Fascists and Monarchists.

                Go reread the thread. The only one lacking reading comprehension here is you .

                • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Based on your extensive comment history it’s not really a wonder that you feel that way. I would bet you also feel that way about the average person on the street or anyone else you intentionally misread.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Actually, that would have to be the opposite order. The court can’t be expanded until there isn’t a republican in the Whitehouse. So priority must be given to impeachment so that the current bad actors don’t try to overturn the next election to save themselves.