Google has put artificial intelligence at the front and center of its search bar. The most-visited site on the internet still shows the same list of links to users, but they have to scroll past a summarized response from an AI chatbot, a feature Google calls AI Overviews. The change to what was once the gateway to the rest of the internet has been profound, and the browsing habits of billions of people are shifting.

  • bruh@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    if you are struggling to find information on google just as here in Lemmy. there will be at least one person who have bookmarked the site you might have been seeking. just be nice to each other :)

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      I have an idea for an instance called MentatSearch or something where everyone joins and if it gets like a 100,000+ subscribers then when people are looking for something online, they can ask there and inevitably someone will know it off the top of their head.

      Kind of like r/identifythisfont on Reddit. There’s like 150,000+ font nerds there and if you post an image of a font, it gets identified within a half hour.

  • Ninja876@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Screw that I miss old school spiders/crawlers. If you knew how to search them correctly you could find “pass dumps” and all kinds of weird shit you can’t find now days.

    Now every search is ranked bullshit and ads. Dead internet is here and only going to get worse…

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nerds missed old google five to ten years ago. It was crap way before the AI garbage, but agreed that they’re shoving bs on us.

    • TheRiskiestBiscuit@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Google was really awesome at a point in time. You could throw it the most obscure query using natural language with in-text Boolean operators and the number one result would direct you to an html-only geocities page that hadn’t been updated since 1999 with the EXACT answer you needed and citations from 3-4 actual, physical books to back up that answer. IMHO, those were peak times for the internet as an information resource; approximately 1998-2008.

      Now every page just seems to be a bloated, poorly-coded monument to engagement baiting, subscription model services, and ad revenue generation. It’s genuinely sad to have watched the degradation over the years…

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think they mean google 20 years ago, like missing YouTube before google bought it, or instagram etc. back when you competed by making a better product, and not ya know, buying the better product and making it worse.

      Before Google we used to have to go to a library to source information.

  • detren@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Even without the AI overview there’s so many AI written articles in search results that it’s hard to get through the noise. Limiting search to pre 2022 only does so much when you want information on something recent.

    I don’t miss the old Google, I miss the old Internet :(

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      theres entire AI generated websites that are just filled with popular key words and bullshit to put it at the top of the search results.

      SEO is as bad as AI when it comes to finding shit on the internet.

      I miss the old internet too, before we even had search engines… when the only way to find a webpage was a webring, or the internet yellow pages… which was just a directory of all known urls at the time.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They’ll bring old Google back and call it Google Classic. They will also have a Google Zero, with zero calories, and, of course, Google with a lemon twist.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      more like they’ll call it google classic, and charge you 25 dollars a month for the privledge of using it.

      but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

        What? No way they’d do the thing Disney just did!

  • Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The worst part about Google search is that everything that is for sale comes first. I have looked for free alternatives that I know exist for work, only to be fed all the for profit alternatives first. Its aggravating.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Google was done a long time before AI came about. I quit using it as a primary search engine probably 5 or more years ago.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      because they found out people would click the next page a few times before giving up, so they started making their results worse, so they could get more page views and more ads shown.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      there is SO GOD DAMN MUCH AI slop on youtube… especially in the shorts. Which I fucking hate shorts, Shorts is literally just the same infinite scrolling addiction driven bullshit that Facebook is being sued over, because google thought “We don’t have to not be evil anymore, so lets develop our own cocaine… with blackjack, and hookers!”

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      14K followers and the oldest video is three weeks ago.

      A single chess game posted first, then Ai cooking slop.

      What a world.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I was listening to a jazz station that was marked as AI, and I have so many questions. Am I listening to an AI’s music is an AI running the playlist I have no idea what is AI about the station but I sure do like zoning out to it.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just wish I’d discovered sooner that there are search engines based in other countries that work wonderfully without all the junk, like Mojeek.

    If you’re looking for Google alternatives, I made a video on the topic earlier this year.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You can also append -ai to exclude AI summaries. I built myself a little homepage with a bunch of widgets and a selection of search engines linked to one search field, with AI defaulting to off.

    I’ve set this to be my Firefox “new tab” page, so when I open a new tab, it pops open, and I can search right away or check weather, external IP address, ECT.

    Yalls are welcome to use it too if you find it useful:

    https://mediaplate.au/

  • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    you have to scroll maybe 1000-1800px now to get to results (past ai and sponsored results) - shit is trash - searxng good enough; just annoying to maintain sometimes when needed in a pinch m. degoog not bad either

      • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I use a mix of water fox & un googled chromium - but don’t even use google anyway; searxng 95% of the time. was just complaining about the poor UX of modern google

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wanted to second Firefox +ublock. I’ve been using that combo since last year and it is very potent.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The most-visited site on the internet still shows the same list of links to users

    Are you motherfucking kidding me with that? Is this some kind of satire?

    • BingBongTheArcher@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Shortly after the change I even noticed that some of the sites used to make/hallucinate the AI summaries weren’t even on the first 3 pages of links aggregated. They existed ONLY inside the tiny icons on the bottom right of the overview/hallucination where it was being cited.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I miss the actual old Google, where the searches wouldn’t intentionally show you a lot of things you don’t want in order to keep you searching longer for their ad revenue. The one where if you put something between “quotes” it would only show you results with those specific words, and you coul -minus a word to specifically exclude results that contained that word.

    Google has been a piece of shit for like 15+ years now. They’re even making android suck.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Truth.

      I just really wish someone would come out with a search engine that works like Google worked around 2004. There was a brief beautiful window of time where it seemed like no matter how obscure something was, if it existed on a publicly indexable website, and you knew the tricks for tweaking your search query, you could find it with Google. But I think I started noticing it going downhill not too long after they killed Google Video and acquired YouTube. Definitely after they also became a phone company.

      It just seems crazy to me that we figured out how to do it over 20 years ago and then stopped almost immediately. And in all the time since then nobody has stepped up to fill the gap. Like, DuckDuckGo is better than Google now, but it’s only because Google became terrible, not because DDG got better.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I remember being taught about search operators in school. Of course they’d take that away, it’s such a powerful way to get exactly what you’re looking for, no bullshit.

      • belochka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think in older search engines the results were not rated at all, and you could use syntax similar to SQL.

        Using them as sort of a Web index. Would be very useful if not for all the bots and SEO sites.

        Unfortunately, Google, Yahoo and others gradually reduced that to just a set of keywords.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    18 hours ago

    noai.duckduckgo.com, for at least one alternative.

    CoMaps or Openstreetmaps instead of Google Maps.

    ProtonMail/ProtonDrive instead of gmail, gdrive.

    There are lots of alternatives, we just need to use them and tell others to use them as well.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      DuckDuckGo is AI opt-out, and for me that’s a non-starter.

      I’ve personally found Kagi the best search alternative.

    • FridaVermercury@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      noai.duckduckgo.com

      I use that too but it doesn’t feel like it helps much anymore. Or it does help and search without it would be absolute hell.

      You still get many links to weird webpages with tons and tons of fluff text without any real information important to you.

      I do some origami here and there and use the search often to see if I can find a page with diagrams I don’t yet know about. There’s AI generated pages waffling on about origami diagrams with no actual diagrams shown. It is so sad to see.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      18 hours ago

      In the past when I tried different engines, I’d eventually get frustrated with a specific queery and resort to google to get what I needed

      Lately, if duck duck fails me, if I bother trying google then the results are even worse. It feels like the end of an era

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I wonder if we’re going to come full circle back to list servers and manually curated content. That doesn’t solve search though. It’s also very difficult to reliable detect an AI vs an actual human.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The antidote is in the poison. We’re going to have to start self-hosting smaller, local LLMs specifically tailored to searching the web to find what you’re looking for (and providing links instead of summaries), while ignoring all the garbage.

          If it can check thousands or millions of pages in a few seconds, it can find stuff buried so deep under all the slop that we would never find it manually.

          Even if you’re not ready to accept this yet, at least download a copy of a model or two from huggingface before nvidia locks it down. 7-14B parameters is probably okay if you don’t have much space/memory.

          Eventually we can use codeberg or ipfs to redistribute what we salvage as a collective. If everyone mirrors a few different models we’ll be in much better shape later down the road when big tech companies start approaching their endgame (full user-lock and ecosystem control expanding into the internet itself)

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I dread having to find answers on random pages now. Its this weird discomfort of not knowing if I’ve gotten dumber and don’t understand stuff I should be able to, or if it just doesn’t make sense. Its so much work to figure out, and im just not sure which at any given time anymore.