Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
Totally ignoring that Democratic presidents have consistently used negotiations and economic pressure rather than military force.
Yes. I also ignored how they used magical powers to force opponents to the negotiating table, and how they can all fly and run at supersonic speeds.
Here in the real world, Obomber dropped way more bombs than Trump.
You can’t prove that because Trump stopped publishing those numbers.
And looking at the numbers up to that point, Obama wins it in a walk. The real reason Trump stopped publishing the numbers is he was embarrassed that he couldn’t outdo Obama.
Okay, then why are we running out of ammo?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9gk58xgng0vo
Yeah like they did with Libya, Syria, Iraq and Russia. Like they did when they sent Pelosi to Taiwan and like they did when they whipped up a frenzy about a Chinese “spy balloon” they then themselves admitted was just meteorological equipment.
Libya - we acted as part of a NATO mission to assist a popular revolution in overthrowing Muammar Gaddafi (dictator, war criminal, torturer, and rapist)
Syria - we acted in support of a civil war to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, a dictator who ran a brutal police state and committed numerous war crimes including using chemical weapons on civilians.
Iraq - a war started by Republican President Bush. The rest was trying to clean up his mess.
Russia - negotiations and economic pressure only. Unless you mean supporting Ukraine,v the ally Russia INVADED.
Chinese “spy balloon” - kinda grasping at straws to paint Democrats as warmongers there, aren’t you?
Aside from proving your absolute willingness to accept US State Department lies at face value, did you have a point with any of that?
Where’s the lie?
The point is there is a difference between defending allies at their request and invading a country unilaterally.
Characterizing is geopolitical adversaries as “brutal dictators”
Characterizing color revolution as “popular revolution” or “civil war”
Characterizing grinding Ukraine to make the bread for a proxy war as “defending an ally”
Like I said, you’ve made it obvious you’ll accept any US State Department narrative at face value without giving it a moment’s critical thought.
Bashar al-Assad was a brutal dictator.
https://snhr.org/blog/2024/12/20/summary-of-the-assad-regimes-crimes-against-the-syrian-people-over-the-last-14-years/
Ghadaffi was beaten to death by his own people.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/4/30/battle-for-libya-key-moments-3
The Ukraine war continues because the Ukranians refuse to cede their country to an invader. Nobody is forcing them to fight.
https://aroundprague.cz/en/news/poll-77-of-ukrainians-ready-to-keep-fighting-even-if-russia-targets-energy-grid
Yes, the US State Department and CIA are very good by now at stirring up a color revolution. That doesn’t make their claims about the targets of their operations accurate.
You’re only proving my point that you’ll happily take the Imperial narrative at face value.