Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
Characterizing is geopolitical adversaries as “brutal dictators”
Characterizing color revolution as “popular revolution” or “civil war”
Characterizing grinding Ukraine to make the bread for a proxy war as “defending an ally”
Like I said, you’ve made it obvious you’ll accept any US State Department narrative at face value without giving it a moment’s critical thought.
Bashar al-Assad was a brutal dictator.
https://snhr.org/blog/2024/12/20/summary-of-the-assad-regimes-crimes-against-the-syrian-people-over-the-last-14-years/
Ghadaffi was beaten to death by his own people.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/4/30/battle-for-libya-key-moments-3
The Ukraine war continues because the Ukranians refuse to cede their country to an invader. Nobody is forcing them to fight.
https://aroundprague.cz/en/news/poll-77-of-ukrainians-ready-to-keep-fighting-even-if-russia-targets-energy-grid
Yes, the US State Department and CIA are very good by now at stirring up a color revolution. That doesn’t make their claims about the targets of their operations accurate.
You’re only proving my point that you’ll happily take the Imperial narrative at face value.