• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          The “price” of a free offline speech to text AI model? Three of them, actually, to work with varying levels of compute resources available?

          You anti-AI folks are friggin’ ridiculous.

          • Cherry@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            I don’t think it’s anti-AI more a lack of trust of services saying here’s a product…and the concern it will be used for ulterior motives. I know I don’t like my voice being captured.

            • lengau@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              What do you think are the ulterior motives behind this GPLv3 licensed app? I think the ulterior motive is getting better accessibility tools so it’s easier to convince governments to use Ubuntu (and likely pay for extended support).

              • Cherry@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                I’m not sure but I’m done believing that tech enhancements pushed at me benefit me.

                • lengau@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  That response, especially given that this is something that’s entirely offline and optional, is probably the closest we’re going to get to you admitting that you just want to be negative about this rather than actually having a criticism of it.

          • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Nothing AI is free. Unless there’s a chain of custody for all of the training data, it’s still unethical even if it’s used for a good thing. If I build a wheelchair ramp out of the flesh and bones of orphans I’m still not a very good person. And there are non-AI ways to accomplish this that are just as good that would require almost comically less resources.

            This attitude is why Ubuntu, and only Ubuntu, recommends a minimum of 6 GB of Ram btw. You can run a full KDE system with onboard graphics and all the bells and whistles for less than 2 GB on other distros.

            • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              If I build a wheelchair ramp out of the flesh and bones of orphans I’m still not a very good person.

              Comparing copyright, a bullshit concept that was designed only to protect the rich, to building with “the flesh and bones of orphans” is so extreme that it’s not even worth arguing about.

              • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Being pro-AI is the same as being pro-capitalist, and thus pro-orphan crushing machine.

                Having your work stolen so that a soulless faceless corporate entity can charge teenagers to recreate it at will and pretend they have any talent or capability whatsoever is pretty shitty, and defending it is anti-proletariat.

                • pooterbroo@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  You know you can use AI yourself too right? There’s no need to be anti-AI when you can be anti-OpenAI/Anthropic/Google/etc.