I’m just making it clear that you don’t have any actual criticisms of this application and haven’t addressed it when people point out that:

• It’s fully offline (so your “services” claim is false)
• It’s GPLv3 licensed (so we can audit and verify what it’s doing)
• This is an opt-in accessibility feature (so it’s not being “pushed” on anyone)

You’re welcome to remain belligerent. I’m not here to change your mind.

That response, especially given that this is something that’s entirely offline and optional, is probably the closest we’re going to get to you admitting that you just want to be negative about this rather than actually having a criticism of it.

What do you think are the ulterior motives behind this GPLv3 licensed app? I think the ulterior motive is getting better accessibility tools so it’s easier to convince governments to use Ubuntu (and likely pay for extended support).