• AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Given the number of legit famous people Epstein surrounded himself with because he was, at that point, rich himself: no being mentioned in the files isn’t a defacto “that person is complicit”. I don’t think Stephen Hawking, Bruce Willis, or Cate Blanchett were diddling kids either despite being in the files. DeCaprio… Well that one wouldn’t surprise me.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I haven’t looked into this, but you’re right that a lot of people are mentioned. However, from the little I’ve heard of this, this guy seems to be more than a mention. From what I’ve heard, it sounds like he was an associate.

    • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      DiCaprio who has no sexual allegations against him, surprises you - but a billionaire who buys prostitutes in a spa suspected of human trafficking gets the benefit of the doubt?

      • Carl@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They were probably referring to the whole “DiCaprio is afraid of women over the age of 25” thing. The man has historically broken up with women as soon as they’re nearing 25, only to start dating a new 18 year old a week or two later.

        I believe his current girlfriend actually holds the record for his oldest, at ~28 years old.

      • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Look if there was evidence of wrongdoing I’d want him to spend just as much time in prison as anyone else, but can we agree what you describe is a pretty far cry from evidence he was fucking kids? Come on now.

        • David_Eight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The videotaping at the business lasted for five days, and wound up recording two women and two men receiving legitimate massages, not just the men paying for sexual services."

          Four people over five days received an actual massage lol. They destroyed the evidence because of a technically. Did you even read the article?

          • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yes, and to be clear consenting adults paying/being paid for sex means fuck all to me, they should legalize it. Involving children? Straight to jail.

            • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 hours ago

              How about slaves or trafficking?

              Sex trafficking, under law, involves recruiting and transporting women by force or fraud, and coercing them to work as prostitutes. The traffickers, Snyder continued, had covered their tracks by moving the women every 10 to 20 days to different spas, where they were forced to sleep on massage tables and cook on hot plates. Some were unable to leave, the sheriff said, because the traffickers confiscated their money and passports.

              https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/the-disturbing-saga-of-robert-kraft

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Slaves/trafficked folk seems covered under the word “consenting”, as coerced consent is not consent, but I’m not op

              • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Believe it or not, straight to jail. But based on everything I read about this specific situation that isn’t the case here, so I’m not sure where you’re going with this.

                • PokerChips@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Kraft is a billionaire. If he was innocent and wanted to keep his name clean then he would have paid money to make sure the video was publicly seen. Instead he paid money to destroy the video. That’s where they are going with this. You think kraft cares about the privacy of the 5 people that got legitimate messages? Nope. He doesn’t even care about genocide. In fact he obviously is vehemently in support of it.

                  Kraft used sex slaves.

                  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    A prostitute is not a sex slave by default. If you fucked a hooker, would you broadcast it to the world? You’re unhinged.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I mean, it sounds like the court ordered the evidence destroyed, so there’s no way to know one way or the other. But isn’t that like kind of shady

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      He’s also a vocal Trump supporter on top of his other transgressions. He’s always been a piece of shit.