Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
I’ve heard so called “liberal” media discuss and condemn Hassan Piker more than I’ve seen them discuss and condemn Trump and all his lackeys combined.
They’re the definition of controlled opposition.
Hassan piker is a nepotistic pos that cosplays as someone that fights for equality.
He’s a twitch streamer, instead of, I don’t know, the President of the United States and his appointed officials. Why should most of the media care about Hassan Piker at all?
Bud, what the hell is your media diet??? That’s a fox-news level of informed take
That’s probably hyperbolic, but Piker’s a big story if you don’t stay in safety bubble lemmy land. It’s a whole new world out there.
I’d provide links and discuss further, but honestly I would rather not get my comment deleted or banned.
Am I supposed to know who he is?
Nah. Some sort of streamer
The logical conclusion to this would be the liberals admitting both sides are bad and the progressive admitting one side is worse.
But liberals don’t think both sides are bad. That’s the issue.
exactly. And that’s why they immediately go to “oh, you think both sides are equally bad?” when nobody says that.
Because either you accept the Democratic centrist position and vote for them, or to them you’ve equated the two.
The Democrats can be better than Trump, and still unacceptable to support. Not just as a moral matter, but as a tactical one as well. Because as long as Schumer and Biden style neoliberalism is a going concern and in leadership, progressives (much less socialists) are not only going to be shutted aside, but actively opposed, as we’ve seen since 2016.