You don’t have to look far that same Wikipedia article to see an entire large section on the exact criticism I raised, coupled with a large body of evidence behind it?
Check your own ignorance.
Occupy had goals but they had like 50 of them and they were poorly coordinated in protests, slogans, and to the media - which is why they had very limited success enacting meaningful change.
Incel meme aside, a lot of the US public really seems to think you can either have a really questionable candidate that agrees with you on some key issue but comes with massive baggage, or a candidate that supports the genocide in Gaza.
As in NY and elsewhere, that this just isn’t true. The establishment Dems don’t want you to know this: you can have both a baggage-free candidate and a candidate that is anti-Israel in the same person.