that iirc lasted just some dozen minutes after initially being listed. that day it closed at $160. it’s the closing price that matters

and even if we compare against that, that’s just <42% off.

70% off

doesn’t seem to be true? lowest recently was 132.15 which is less than 23% off the peak of 170.86. and that wasn’t even a closing price; by the day’s end it was back above 135 and the stock has never closed below 135.

Link: “Like guarantees of future returns, this page doesn’t exist.”

this article sounds like AI too, i am going crazy

it was also an opportunity for everyone to kumbayah and get some good press on addressing affordability

(the colors are whether and how much the stock rose, not credit rating)

yahoo news is not a news source but a site that republishes articles from other websites. you can tell from the top here that this is the exactly same article from Gadget Review

apparently the 404media part is just a part of the article where it cites previous incidents. so then we don’t even have a source for the meat of the article save a random X thread.

that’s not a summary; that’s the first paragraphs of the article

(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, the non–open-source part here being NC)

obviously LLM-generated article from an odd outlet that publishes five articles every hour

the news is real because it just regurgitates 404media

“As 4Chan has no assets in the United Kingdom (given that it has no connection to the United Kingdom), that would require you to show up in a US court as a platiff, waive soreign immunity, and overcome existing U.S. doctrine regarding the non-enforcement of foreign regulatory penalties.

—article!

the only reason they backtracked is because users weren’t happy?

How do you think open-source development works?

the code was never even merged; that’s definitely not true

it was never opt-out, it was always planned to be opt-in