• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    At least in that case they could be stupid enough to think ChatGPT magically knows everything (lord knows a lot of people seem to think that) and be genuinely trying to help. I can kind of forgive being incredibly stupid and not realizing it if your intentions are good.

    Posting fake bird photos requires making or pretending you made them. Either case is shitty.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t. On a lot of phones you can just zoom in and the camera will use AI to fill in what it wants because of some “super zoom” (or similar) feature.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It’s different, but very similar. AI will just fill in what it doesn’t know with something that it does know.

          Really it’s kind of worse than the moon photos. At least that is what the moon would actually look like.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      The mental illness in that case is a photo hobbyist thinking, “I should have been able to take that picture; AI is just helping me.”

      To me it is exactly related to “i should be able to answer that forum supporr question. AI is just helping me.”

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I could see sharpening a somewhat blurry but awesome photo (not enough time for exposure) as a valid enough reason.
        But I think I wouldnt post it to a forum and just keep it to myself.

    • dil@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      While it doesn’t know everything like that, its gotten very hard to make the pro models fail on freelance ai training sites, they only fail on roundabout logic like “on the year the cardinals won the superbowl, the state that the kicker is from, had a protest that year, what is the name of the winner of the golden globes for best actor year the leader of that protest died.” and it wouldnt fail at that probably.

      It’s a chore to get it to fail on anything that could possibly have a source online (which is key here, you guys didn’t have a valid online source so it hallucinated, when making it fail for training you need to provide an answer with sources to show the AI is failing)