• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes yes it did look like many versions of what I would answer to as a jolly roger

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Then you don’t know what a jolly roger looks like either. And all this proves is that you don’t know what a totenkopf is. The tattoo was still a totenkopf, as recognizable by literally anyone that knows what it looks like, which is why he covered the fucking thing up, it’s not a fucking debate whether or not it was a totenkopf because it was. Fucking Nazi apologist ass.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve already admitted I don’t know… The accusation that Lemmy doesn’t know what a totenkopf is is the entire reason I responded in the first place.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          “I don’t know what makes this skull and bones different from any other Jolly Roger I’ve ever seen” expecting us to think that’s a reasonable statement is unreasonable.

          You know what a totenkompf is, it’s been shown to you. You’ve seen it, and like a swastika or a blue Israeli 6 pointed star, you can recognize immediately if it’s just a similar design or actually the fucking Nazi symbol.

          You’ll never be watching pirates of the Caribbean and think “is that a totenkompf?” and you’ll never look at Platner’s totenkompf and think “that’s a Jolly Roger”

          And the fact that you’re trying so hard to convince us that you would is apologizing for Nazis.