• edible_funk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Then you don’t know what a jolly roger looks like either. And all this proves is that you don’t know what a totenkopf is. The tattoo was still a totenkopf, as recognizable by literally anyone that knows what it looks like, which is why he covered the fucking thing up, it’s not a fucking debate whether or not it was a totenkopf because it was. Fucking Nazi apologist ass.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve already admitted I don’t know… The accusation that Lemmy doesn’t know what a totenkopf is is the entire reason I responded in the first place.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        “I don’t know what makes this skull and bones different from any other Jolly Roger I’ve ever seen” expecting us to think that’s a reasonable statement is unreasonable.

        You know what a totenkompf is, it’s been shown to you. You’ve seen it, and like a swastika or a blue Israeli 6 pointed star, you can recognize immediately if it’s just a similar design or actually the fucking Nazi symbol.

        You’ll never be watching pirates of the Caribbean and think “is that a totenkompf?” and you’ll never look at Platner’s totenkompf and think “that’s a Jolly Roger”

        And the fact that you’re trying so hard to convince us that you would is apologizing for Nazis.