• ArcaneGadget@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    “What is the most resource inefficient way we can come up with, to get supplies to the frontline.” I hate theese tech-bros so much…

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not the worst idea. The road between your basecamp and the frontline can easily be blocked by enemies, but the line between a satelite and your frontline is not easily blocked. For simplicity I’m assuming our hypthetical enemy doesn’t have an abundance of relatively cheap ground to air missiles, like every military in the world has.

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Why would you want this over just airdropping supplies?

        Also I’m no military need, but if the road between your basecamp and the frontline can easily be blocked then I don’t think you actually hold that territory and may have over extended yourself and no matter how many supplies you drop/“Enemy” “combatants”/civilians you kill, you’re likely losing the war (see Rhodesia (LOL) or Vietnam)

        • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well, a suborbital flight is less than an hour to anywhere. That absolutely has its advantages if cost and efficiency aren’t factors, but the payload would still have to be prepared and loaded. At that point, it just sounds like a way to compensate for bad logistics. It could be legitimately useful for emergency/surprise operations, but those also aren’t something you want to build your overall strategy around.

  • Soulphite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure, lets jump straight to MILITARY and not… oh say, I dunno… space exploration? Typical military industrial complex bullshit.

    Sick of this fucking timeline.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dude, you realize the whole ‘going to the moon’ thing was just a way to convince the public to fund ballistic missile technology? And the whole reason for the shuttle was to steal Russias satellites? One of the biggest use cases for space is war. Space travel won’t feed anyone.

      • robear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        We can already feed everyone. We just choose not to. Space travel has nothing to do with it, but we should do it anyway.

          • dzsimbo@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Not if we have gay space-communism and anyone and their mother can use the skytrain (my colloquial name for a space elevator).

              • dzsimbo@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Love ‘em! I think one of Banks’ Culture books even has a river running through one. I really believe it’s more a matter of when and not if. We probably won’t see one, unless longevity treatments become a thing.

                • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 minutes ago

                  Not Banks Orbitals, which are amazing and a fair way into the future, but orbital rings. They’re another launch system like space elevators, but have some advantages and drawbacks.

      • cy888@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Ballistic missile tech already existed.

        It was modified for use in the Mercury program.

  • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hasn’t this clearly been the plan for years, surprised this is a a surprise to anyone. When musk was talking about delivering payloads anywhere in the world in under an hour, he’s wasn’t talking about getting you toilet paper quicker (or solving world hunger)

  • harrison_fnord@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok this is it. Last straw for me. Imma go do something now.

    Technology has failed us. Time to build some emps, time to stop paying taxes.

  • NM_Gringo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Just as soon as Ketamine Man gets his rockets to stop blowing up or looking like crispy critters when they ditch in the ocean.