Surveillance just became a factory-fitted option you can't decline.
  • glasratz@feddit.orgEnglish
    4·
    3 days ago

    Don’t you feel that this is a bit uncalled for? All I said is that these pieces of software do not in fact identify cancer. They are not reliable because they aren’t even allowed to be in the circumstances that they are supposed to be used. They are a visual aid, nothing more.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      21·
      3 days ago

      Every article and paper I found so far concludes that AI improves the ability of medical personnel to recognize and diagnose cancer.

      And no, it is not uncalled for, because I had to deal with such bullshit the whole damn day (and not for the first time) and it is enough. I’m logging out for today.

      • glasratz@feddit.orgEnglish
        31·
        3 days ago

        Every article and paper I found so far concludes that AI improves the ability of medical personnel to recognize and diagnose cancer.

        I’m not saying it doesn’t. I’m saying it doesn’t detect cancer and is not reliable. If you know how it’s supposed to work, it works. It suggests areas where you should look. However, there are doctors who don’t know how to use it and they can and will kill people with it.

        I had to deal with such bullshit the whole damn day (and not for the first time) and it is enough.

        The way your last post was worded, I would very much suggest that that’s a you problem.