• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Naw, in the US Liberalists stand in the way of Progressives. They are not on the same team because one is radical in nature and the other is conservative.

    While the strict definitions will muddy these two terms most people who understand what is going on resist this trap.

    • FiredFloridaCop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Never heard of the term “Liberalist” before. Is that some hip new way to refer to liberals?

      By every definition of “progressive” and “liberal” I know, they overlap.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        A liberalist is someone who advocates liberalism.

        Yes, as I said traditional definitions will muddy these waters. That is why I said in the US.

        Liberalists regularly work against progressives in US politics. If they are the same then why are they opposed?

        • FiredFloridaCop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          A liberalist is someone who advocates liberalism.

          … bruh.

          So to you, a person who advocates fascism is a fascistist?

          Liberalists regularly work against progressives in US politics. If they are the same then why are they opposed?

          Because they are on opposite ends of the same area of the political spectrum, obviously. Same reason groypers don’t get along with MAGA.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It is the definition of the word. Not sure where you are going. You would prefer me to use liberal instead of liberalist…? The problem is a liberal doesn’t necessarily advocate for liberalism. A liberalist does. A progressive advocates for progressive policies.

            Progressives want to reform liberal systems that are broken. You can keep pretending they are the same all you want, but they are diametrically opposed in the US.

            • FiredFloridaCop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s just inane splitting of hairs - a pointless distinction.

              What do you call a fascist that spreads fascism? A fascist.

              What do you call a fascist that doesn’t spread fascism? A fascist.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Its not though. A liberal just exists and does not necessarily advocate for liberalism.

                A fascist may or may not spread fascism, but a liberalist definitely tries spreads liberalism. Would you like to talk about other weird things in the English language?