• Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How much better is it? I am thinking in terms of compression.

    • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m seeing reports of a 20-30% improvement in bitrate usage. But the encoders are also still early at this point

    • Majestic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah until it starts hitting widespread hardware decode support (streaming devices and phones) it’s pretty much just a curiosity to all involved as the only things traditionally powerful enough to software decode these codecs at 4k without overheating are computers and I don’t see that changing.

      If h266 gets hw decode support on a bunch of common chips first it’ll be a real blow licensing freedom or not.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s a different world, there isn’t much driving VVC like there was for AVC and HEVC. There isn’t a new physical media format, and even the latest OTA TV specification is stuck on HEVC.

        It’s going to be up to streaming platforms what wins the next codec race, and a lot of them are betting on AV1 and AV2 for obvious reasons. I don’t see VVC really getting widespread adoption.