Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
Junk science.
Those shows are propaganda. Propublica has done some good reporting on this, I can link it if you care to read any of it.
Not saying it’s good science. It’s just a good point. If you have a bite scar on your dick, it’s most likely because you tried putting it somewhere that it should not be.
In the context where a lady comes out of the shadows and says she put a scar on Trumps mushroom, where nobody had ever mentioned a scar on Trumps mushroom before, and it is later revealed that Trump does indeed have a scar on his mushroom…
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… what is it?
It doesn’t require much science. Victim testifies she bit the attacker and it drew blood. Attacker has scar of approximately the same age. That’s not going to secure a conviction on its own, but it adds to the prosecution’s evidence.
If it didn’t draw blood, it’d be harder to find a lasting mark.
It’s all bullshit, and has been proven to be bullshit. You are like one of those people still thinking dinosaurs were reptiles while we have known they were birds.