GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)
grapheneos.social
@bekkaboo@girlcock.club Linux itself is heavily using AI models. Therefore, every Linux distribution moving to recent kernel versions is heavily built on top of using AI models. Creating a Linux distribution not heavily using it would require a hard fork of the Linux kernel and many other projects. It's unclear what would be accomplished by banning AI for a tiny portion of the code while continuing to use Linux, AOSP, Chromium and hundreds of other projects heavily using it. We'd still be benefiting from it.

GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.

    • BrickEater@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      7 days ago

      Well, I hardly use my PC and was just forced to get one for a job to do email bullshit, so in my day to day, yes. And Ive been exploring getting a basic ass flipphone and a atlas instead of relying on googles shit GPS system, I already use OSM instead but still.

    • Voixe2@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      31·
      7 days ago

      I would sooner migrate to templeOS than use slopOS in gunna be real. There is always an archived iso

    • Mac@mander.xyzEnglish
      54·
      6 days ago

      You’ll use it because we will leave you no other option

      You slop garglers really are wonderful people.

      Also, didn’t Debian declare that AI generated code is not compliant with their policies?

      Also also: organic foods, human-powered bicycles, acoustic music, manual transmissions, etc

      • mholiv@lemmy.worldEnglish
        131·
        7 days ago

        Linux, Windows, and MacOS devs definitely do use LLMs to help with coding.

        In your defense NetBSD does not, but I would not consider NetBSD to be one of the big 3.