• ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Probably gonna get hate for this but like… Yeah if I had the option to pay for more things and not be tracked and dataharvested, I would. The infrastructure and support isn’t free. What’s really shit is when they do both… The prices should be lower, like way way way lower, but middlemen all want their cuts for transactions so you’ll almost never see subs for under a dollar.

    • brawndo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Just because you pay a subscription to avoid ads does not mean your data is not still being harvested and sold. The big exception is now they have a payment method tied to a specific person not just an ad profile.

    • Superorbit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I mean I get where you’re coming from, but imo we shouldn’t have to pay to not be tracked and data harvested. You can run ads and have them not be creepy stalky, it’s only greed to maxmize profits that pushes companies to go for the stalker option.

  • JoshCodes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t use tiktok for reasons that would be preaching to the choir here, but pardon me for asking… Isn’t everything on TikTok an ad? Like they’re either telling people to buy a book, put sugary syrup in water, buy organising plastic containers, selling slime, selling ice cube trays that ironically make them no longer cubes, selling makeup, clothing hauls, generating affiliate revenue, asking people to enlist… I could go on. It’s just ads all the way down? What would someone see if they removed all the #ad posts?

  • Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Join the premium brain rot plan today! Addictively doom scroll through ai slop ad free for less than 5 quid a month!

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    TBH, I think 50% of my wife’s TT usage is finding cheap neat things on TT ads.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      How does that break GDPR.

      They even allowed to charge money if you want no ad related cookies.

      Most webpages are like pay 1€/month or accept the cookies. Totally legal and within law. Another instance of EU institutions being lobbied into supporting business above people.

      • theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s not clear yet whether its within the law. There is multiple complaints regarding this being filed across the eu, and noyb is actively campaigning for this to be investigated. The argument is that gdpr demands the user being given a real choice. However, most sites pick the monthly fee at 4-5 €, which seems low but is actually very offputting and deliberately chosen such that most people accept cookies instead. A strong indicator for this is that a paid subscription nets the site about 3€ a month, while ad revenue per user per month is only about 0,25 €. So you would think they could offer a lot lower subscription fees. The fact that they won’t means they really really want to track you and dark oattern you into accepting.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    To be fair, one thing often overlooked is these things don’t run in rainbows and unicorn dust. Especially a video platform. $$. To expect it completely free is kind of crazy.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’d be willing to devote taxes to social media without ads and featuring a non-malevolent algorithm. If it allowed people to communicate with each other like Twitter or Facebook, it would be a service to the benefit of the public.

      Once upon a time, at least here in the states, we believed in a government that served the public good.