I imagine that is a choice that they weigh up, for financial gain compared to risk. To some people who don’t come from wealth, that is a valid option for them.

If someone can’t buy a house in London then maybe it is too “complicated” for them to live there

They are all psychotic. The bottom line is that you cannot talk to them straight. They don’t have any answers for you.

It isn’t inconceivable that they have picked up on the “hype-wagon” that AI is being propelled with. Investors have poured a lot into the technology and consistently promote the technology while all other sectors of society have mixed feelings about it. Still I agree that I can’t see why a financial incentive is being ruled out. Maybe it is based on the idea of putting people first, and not selfishly cutting jobs from society, then again, that would invalidate the idea in the first instance.

How would this be different from how we use AI in online applications? It’s always a chore to use those things - it really is no different from ticking boxes on a machine. Surely something which is necessarily based around human interaction will not be replaced by that? I think it’s a joke more than anything. If anyone seriously wants to get anything done then they will be in bad luck.