great american humorist. non-aesthetic socialist libtard. proud appalachian-american.
That’s not a very… European sounding last name. He must not be aware that he is not immune from the hate machine.
Unfortunately a lot of democrats share these shitty views on “others” like transgender people, gay people, etc.
Double humiliating.
How humiliating it must be to work for this man.
Subd. 3. Exemption. The prohibitions in subdivision 2 do not apply when the website, application, software, program, or other service requires the technical skill of a user to nudify an image or video.
I get the idea, but this doesn’t comfort me, because what is “technical skill” here? That seems subjective and will ultimately be up to a court to decide. What constitutes a skill? It’s prompting a skill? Is prompting Photoshop’s AI a skill? Their lasso tool is pretty easy to use. The line isn’t clear, and a clever lawyer, or a judge, or a jury could come down differently on what counts and what doesn’t.
I get the goal here. But I think we were already covered by the existing law that made distribution of these artificial nudes illegal.
Creating and distributing AI nudes of people was already illegal in Minnesota. This is a separate law that makes hosting or providing any service or “software” that has the ability to do that illegal. It is broadly worded and makes more than the intended target illegal, which was already illegal to begin with.
Not smooth, just that the PATRIOTS showed out in such numbers that Xi couldn’t print enough ballots to overcome them. Factories cranking out millions of fake DEMONRAT ballots were beaten by the hard working PATRIOTS showing up in numbers never seen before! Some say the biggest numbers.
If the teaparty people could do it, so can we.
They would never. Surely.