That is the main reason I haven’t gotten a framework either. It’s hard to compete with used especially when it already has your top feature.
In the case of the 270K Plus, it’s now $339 to $349, with its smaller sibling now $219 to $229.
That’s a minimum increase of $40 and $20, respectively, and while it’s not a huge leap in the grand scheme of things, a 13%/10% rise isn’t merely pennies, either.
That is just a $10 increase each, no? Not ideal, but probably not worth writing an article over.
16 is too high. I feel that under 13 would probably be the right age. Kids need to be slowly integrated into things they will deal with as adults, so having a 5 year range allows more gradual access.
If they really want to address the issues of social media, then they need to target the algorithms. They are designed to be as addictive as possible. These social media companies also need to be held accountable for what gets shown in feeds since it is a form of speech.
Aren’t the Chinese pushing for AI too? That comment makes no sense
The issue is removing another option for acquiring a game as well as a lack of ownership.
Physical media allows you to do whatever you want with your copy of the game. It allows the market to determine the price of the game instead of just sitting at whatever price they want on the digital store.
There is also the issue of download speeds. There are still many people in the world who have awful download speeds and/or data caps. Those people will lose the option to have the entire game on the disc.
Its unstable as a target platform for development. You never know when it will break API/ABI compatibility. It’s why most containers target Ubuntu, Debian, Alpine, and UBI. The versions can be locked and you can be assured that your software won’t randomly break one day after and update.
For some reason people have taken that as being unstable to use as a system, which hasn’t been the case for me either.