Or we have different perspectives.

From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist.

Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling.

I suggest reading “Debt” by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence.

No, anarchism is a libertarian/liberal type of philosophy. Obviously not the same.

I’ve read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat.

Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling.

Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one.

Ludicrous, because of it’s inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society.

The shorthand of “libertarianism, but even more ludicrous” sums it up well.

There is no need to smear communistic movements. They manage so well on their own.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward

https://www.levandehistoria.se/english/learn-and-teach/crimes-against-humanity-under-communist-regimes-research-review

I do agree that web 1.0 and the 1960-80 computer science field was a great example of classless movements. But they didn’t come from communistic societies.

Nope. Just blessed with the ability to summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion.

No? Not even a little bit.

Thanks for your incredibly valuable input of nothing.

Thats just even more fucked up libertarianism.

All forms of larger scale attempts at communism ends with dictatorship. There is no other practical way to enforce the “correct way” of existing within the human species. Correct according to who? Religion is pretty similar to communism in that way. There is either a God/king that expresses what you are allowed to do, or a written text that is followed at the moral guideline.

Then the end stage of communism, is communism.

What Stalin did, is the end of communism. What followed was the decline and lack of innovation.

Same. But if i put on the headlamp i use when cutting claws, i might aswell have tried to kill her family in front of her.

Good, so you agree that OP made a shitty meme too? I just made the same joke but reversed it.

And all i had to do is perform 80% of all crimes!

Yeah dude. How can they be expected to be taken seriously with a mere 20%. Slackers.

Is it really punching up though? The victim complex is part of the bias, jackass.

Although it might have been funnier to make it 20% effort.

More like, want to have the same outcome as men at 80% of the effort.

Or am I making a shitty effort meme that mimics OP? If you’re offended by this joke and not by OP, think of your own bias.