So your response boils down to “no u,” and insulting. I believe we are done here.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
- rayboy@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Why your local LLM feels dumber than it isEnglish5·1 day ago
- rayboy@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Why your local LLM feels dumber than it isEnglish51·1 day ago
I haven’t even argued that AI is concious, I have said that we do not understand consciousness enough to define it. You have completely missed the point. This is Dunning-Kruger at its peak. You are vastly oversimplifying things, at what size of brain is an animal considered conscious or capable of thought? Define thought. We don’t even have a solid understanding of life, much less thoughts. Yes we have a word definition, no we do not know where the line begins and ends. It is a philosophical question that remains unanswered.
This definition is already making so many assumptions and over simplifications. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/thought
We understand that the brain is what gives us our cognition, we understand that the brain is made up of chemical and electrical signals. We are not special.
- rayboy@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Why your local LLM feels dumber than it isEnglish68·1 day ago
Are we not just prediction systems with more neurons?
Now im not saying LLMs are human at all because to be human is to have gone through our exact evolutionary path, but we really are in a lot of ways much more similar than you think. At least the speaking part of our brain is.
The argument that LLMs are fixed in time does not contradict consciousness. Say a human was stuck in a time loop and the human is asked the same question every single loop, at the exact same time, in the exact same way, with every single atom being in the exact place. Would their answer change? I would argue no, the same exact neurons would be stimulated every time that would cause the same exact answer every time.
We don’t even have a solid definition of what is concious. Are insects conscious? Like the fruit fly, we have modeled all of its neural paths and it simplifies down to essentially being a robot that responds to stimuli.
What does make humans special is our ability to learn. But what when an LLM trains its self? Is that not learning? I think the question of consciousness is too complex to simply say one way or the other and it is foolish to simply it this way.
Who the fuck is that Obsession movie looking woman holy shit she is terrifying.
- rayboy@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Whistleblower Says Mark Zuckerberg Is Only Pretending to Care About Child SafetyEnglish7·2 days ago
Honestly this pic is still too humanizing for him.
Correct, nothing is special about biological consciousness. If these exact functions are replicated mechanically/artificially, the outcomes would be the same.