Well I see your point, but I’d suggest that it only stands in a casual/commercial context, research have been using it as an umbrella for the three paradigms I mentioned
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
You cannot invalidate what is called AI just because of the advancements in the fields, what you just described although simple is indeed AI and automation was humanities first attempt at AI anyways. On the other hand yes OPs point of view is invalid and I think that’s just part of the meme
Not quite, AI is split into three paradigms: symbolic, connectionist and semi-symbolic, you only considered the connectionist one
- partzel@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.world•Hackers steal millions of Discord IDs and email addresses in "deliberate, multi-stage attack" on security service Double CounterEnglish4·18 days ago
It is more than usuable though, my only issue with it is the lack of communities other than that both apps and servers are pretty reliable imo
- partzel@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Yes, no AI is now a feature - TDF Community BlogEnglish914·24 days ago
The way the commercialization of LLMs just ruined the word AI, word processors have been using AI in other ways for ages
- partzel@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AIs as Modern Genies - Schneier on SecurityEnglish4·2 months ago
Ironically that’s literally what can happen with a genie, you will forbid them from something with guardrails but still find a way to give you what you did not want
For an early access it actually has relatively lots of content