Maybe the administration just misunderstood the meaning and the mandate of the White house.
Oh no, you!
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
- neidu3@sh.itjust.workstopolitics @lemmy.world•Judge Rules Against Trump, Says He Clearly Prefers White PeopleEnglish5·5 days ago
A Swede, a German, and a Brazilian walk into a bar.
“Where’s the Norwegian?” The bartender asks them.
The three guests look at the floor, and begrudgingly reply:
“Still playing football…”
- neidu3@sh.itjust.workstoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•How much do you secure a home server that's only accessible with VPN?English9·6 days ago
My home servers have generally a lot smaller attack surface, as only a few ports are actually routed to them, so in theoey I could get away with a more relaxed approach. But I’m also a big believer in defense-in-depth, so I follow the same rules of thumb:
- iptables (or equivalent) that drops anything incoming that isn’t wanted. It also rejects anything going out that isn’t planned for.
- any public facing service (except ssh) gets its own user
- disable root login via ssh
- ssh login with key only on any user in sudoers
Disclaimer I’m not American, and I don’t really have much actual knowledge on this subject.
…but I THINK US presidents can actually do this. I’m not sure what the legal mechanism is, but I do remember some chatter some15 years ago about Obama releasing the reserves. This makes me believe that the strategic reserve builds up during normalcy, and can be drained through executive action.