• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 27th, 2023

help-circle




  • I don’t, but that seems like a pretty easy thing to calculate. timeanddate.com (or your local weather service, probably) will give you times for sunrise and sunset on any given day; just:

    • subtract an hour from the sunrise and sunset times on June 21 to find out the earliest sunrise and latest sunset to convert to permanent standard time, or
    • add an hour to the sunrise and sunset times on December 21 to find out the latest sunrise and earliest sunset to convert to permanent DST.

    Unless you’re in the southern hemisphere, then flip those two.

    So if you’re in New York:

    • On permanent DST, the sun rises around 8:15 AM and sets around 5:30 PM on the shortest day of the year. (Longest day would be the same as it is now)
    • On permanent standard time, the sun rises around 4:30 AM and sets around 7:30 PM on the longest day of the year. (Shortest day would be the same as it is now)

    Add an hour per time zone going west to figure out what the times for each time zone would be. Also, New York is pretty near the center of what the UTC-5 time zone would be if it were just a straight longitudinal band, so if you’re near the eastern edge of your time zone it’ll be about a half hour earlier than that, and if you’re near the western edge of your time zone it’ll be about a half hour later than that.

    Personally, that 4:30 summer sunrise sounds brutal. Almost as brutal as the 4:30 sunset that they currently have in the winter. But I dunno, I feel like I could adapt to anything given enough time.

    I’m originally from Indianapolis, which is in Eastern but practically on the border with Central, so the winter solstice would be 9:00 AM - 6:30 PM in permanent DST and the summer solstice would be 5:15 AM - 8:15 PM in permanent standard. But I’m in Auckland currently, so worldwide permanent DST would actually line me up pretty nicely with my friends back home, which could be cool.





  • I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m not even saying I disagree, but I don’t think those move the needle on public sentiment like the Sony and Microsoft stuff. “Well, I don’t pirate Switch games, so my console won’t get bricked.” vs “Hey! But I buy physical copies of games!” and “Hey! They’re laying off a bunch of people, and I can imagine how that would feel.”

    Honestly, what Sony is doing to capture platform lock-in isn’t substantially different from what Nintendo did. They were just quieter about it, or maybe they phrased the announcement better, or maybe they just get away with it because it’s not as visceral.



  • I mean…on one hand, it’s pretty easy for Steam Valve to be doing well. They’re the only major platform that’s released a new console this year (except for Nintendo), they’re the hardware manufacturer with the biggest recent success (except for Nintendo) in the Steam Deck, and they’re the only major platform without any well-publicized egg on their face (except for Nintendo). It also helps that they basically own the entire PC space outright, where the other platforms are fighting amongst themselves (except for Nintendo).

    But that brings up the Italian-plumber-with-a-powerup-that-turns-him-into-an-elephant in the room. Nintendo has been doing really well, too; and while, since the Wii, they’ve largely abandoned the power gamer space to the three players mentioned in this headline, the Switch 2 was a crazy release.

    Obviously, Steam has made a lot of great bets that have paid off, they’ve managed to keep up customer goodwill by limiting anti-competitive behavior and focusing on good product and service over vendor lock-in, and they’re clearly the least anti-consumer player in the space right now. But Nintendo’s strategy of “make the games so compelling and polished that people won’t care about the lock-in” is basically the polar opposite, and it’s working too; so I don’t know how well we can draw conclusions about the industry from this.