True, but a cancelled order costs you time and hassle. Leaked id and credit card info can cost much more.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•Use of VPNs to bypass age checks on porn sites to be investigated by Australia’s eSafety watchdogEnglish1·21 hours ago
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•The Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social MediaEnglish1·21 hours ago
Not with a shelf. It rests there. I’m not talking fluid diets, but soft not fully formed mass. There is a whole scale for assessing stool. For most people it’s unnecessary but it can be helpful for those with things like crohns disease or IBS or ibd. Or even just for descripties for people describing discrepancy to their doctor.
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•The Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social MediaEnglish2·22 hours ago
What if you didn’t have solid turds, generally?
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•Use of VPNs to bypass age checks on porn sites to be investigated by Australia’s eSafety watchdogEnglish16·21 hours ago
Oh, I assume it will also increase fraud. Lots of dodgy sites will ask for ids and/or credit card details to verify age. I wouldn’t trust them without a vpn, age verification or not. Edit: typo
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•The Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social MediaEnglish8·2 days ago
Its to allow inspection of faeces prior to flush, I believe. For health purposes.
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.world•The Death of the Status Update: Why 55% of Americans Stopped Posting on Social MediaEnglish221·2 days ago
It pretty exists ai. While it was novel and actually social, it was fun and a good way to keep up with friends that you see less often.
Then they started pushing influencers and people starting posting an idealised version of their life. Then the feeds all devolved into junk, even before AI slop.
Its because they took the joy and monetised it while making people trust them less and less. Post about an engagement, get wedding ads. Post holiday photos, then find out they were data mined. Wish someone happy birthday and find it’s just a stream of 100s of cookie cutter messages on their page.
So people moved on or became lurkers that don’t post. A lot of engagement moved from social onteractuin with people you know to Facebook community groups which became effectively ragebait and clickbait.
- hitmyspot@aussie.zonetoPiracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Kim Dotcom Loses Court of Appeal Bid to Block Extradition to the U.S. * TorrentFreakEnglish14·11 days ago
Can he just say he did it all to train ai?
I agree fully with the crap in the feed. The inmediacy though, not so much. I recall when they started that and people were still posting they tried to use it for engagement. A new post from a friend that had engagement would be repeatedly resurfaced in your feed.
It did mean less consequential posts from days earlier did feel stale and pointless when they were pushed through again, though, if that’s what you meant.