Oh hey, it’s my comment on HN they pointed to as having anti ai psychosis, ama

Yes by non-profits. What VC backed python runtimes are you referring to?

Both deno and bun felt like experiments in VC funded language runtimes and both of them failed. It reinforced the idea to me that you cannot productize runtimes and they need to be funded by other means

You mentioned self hosting but if you want something without any lock in, there’s https://prose.sh/ — it open source, supports images, markdown, and you bring your own editor.

The reason I want to see a compositor comparison is because on Wayland the implementation really matters. This isn’t actually a x vs Wayland comparison, it’s actually x vs 1 Wayland compositor.

For all we know there’s a KWin perf issue that has nothing to do with Wayland itself.

I’ve been a paying Kagi user for years and I don’t see why I would use this browser. The only selling point to me is WebKit and there are only projects that support that on Linux

Hmm it looks like they only tested KDE (KWin) compositor. I’d love to see how various Wayland server implementations impact performance since the compositor controls when it commits frames to the display controller.