No, I mean more like “Meta to pay just 10% of original fine” - So people get an idea of how their judiciary system really works.
the state was awarded $219.5 billion, but the penalty was ultimately reduced to $25 billion.
would have been a better headline, tbh
Sorry, but the article is behind a paywall, so I’m assuming the copy/paste in the OP is accurate to the original article. In the OP, the brexit argument is literally the 1st point the author makes after claiming “This is not an education, but an indoctrination”. That makes it sound rather important to the basis of their argument.
But, please, go ahead and claim “tankies” are misrepresenting the issue.
By paraphrasing one of the key points in the article, it does actually look like they read it before commenting.
I think this weird anti-self-checkout crowd is just young people who don’t remember the times before self-checkouts.
What crowd? As far as I can see, the article is talking about retailers who want to do this, not customers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXLqrMljdfU - Yes, this is uplifting news for all but the terminally car-brained.
Even if that were true, it would still be better than cars taking all the space.
I don’t understand why it scored so abysmally
politics plays a role
The truth was out there, all along.
Perhaps because unlike the current situation with England, there’s actually a net positive effect of affiliation with the EU.
Besides, the whole “ruled” thing was an emotive term used to goad a poorly informed electorate into barely passing an advisory referendum.
You’re technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.