• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 17 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2026

help-circle


  • It doesn’t matter, because I don’t have the intention of deconstructing a specific thing you said. My intention in to disqualify your general position, which supports Israel as evidenced by your unwarranted appeal to “murdered civilians” (which is equivalent to the “have they condemned Khhhamas?” cliche), again something that according to the original news source here in this post (https://www.newarab.com/news/german-state-bans-pro-palestine-group-over-antisemitism) has not been definitely shown to have been celebrated by the group.

    As per the article:

    Authorities also accused the group of supporting terror, highlighting remarks made by a prominent member who described the 7 October attacks on Israel as a “successful resistance action”. It is unclear when the statements were made.

    This does not concern any official positioning by the group itself. It regards supposed statements by a single member.


  • You posted an Egotronic song, an act that is famously pro-Israel from what I can find online. Also you talk about “killing civilians”, a painful Hasbara talking point meant to deflect and divert attention away from Israel’s genocide in Palestine, which has been a continuity since the 40’s. The appeal to civilian deaths also masks the Israeli military being a primary target for Hamas, the occupying and terrorising force prior to Oct. 7 – I refer to Professor Dave’s fantastic video on Destiny. Remember here that Israel has nukes, the Palestinians outdated Soviet weapons at best. Israel also counts potentially self-inflicted deaths under the Hannibal directive as being deaths caused by the enemy side.

    Secondly your point about murdering civilians would only be truly relevant if the organisation that was banned actually advocated that. The best “evidence” I could find regarding that was a claim about the one of the leaders of the organisation referring to Oct. 7 as an great act of resistance, it’s apparently not documented when they said this, in what context they said this, and most importantly not clear if they made such a statement in the first place.

    More than a year ago German police raided flats of individuals who supposedly were members of this organisation, despite that not having been the case. It’s clear that there is significant overreach on the side of the German state to curtail speech. Palastina e.V. has been long-disbanded, but the German government decides to ban them? It makes no sense, from a traditional legalistic standpoint, it only makes sense when you consider German state interest. This is being criticised, you were derailing the discussion away from the core gripe.











  • I know that in disciplines such as math there are very often have books with less than 50 copies in circulation. The LLM companies buy maybe 2 of a given book which are subsequently destroyed with no backup data. You’re now at 48 in circulation, that is a significant reduction. Rinse and repeat a couple of million times and this starts to have a major influence on knowledge.

    What’s perverse about it is that the data from the books is stored extremely badly within the models. So not only are you destroying sources, you are also necessarily falsifying them.