That definition is way too broad and ignores why the term exists. Genocide is a specific legal concept from the 1948 UN Convention, not a catch-all word for any group of people you decide to label.
The law only covers national, ethnical, racial, or religious groups because those are the categories that have historically been targeted for systematic annihilation. Political groups were explicitly excluded when the convention was drafted for a reason. If you just define it as any group you want to destroy, the word loses all legal weight and precision.
You can call mass violence against other groups a crime against humanity or a war crime—those are still incredibly serious—but calling it genocide just because it fits your personal preference is factually wrong. Precision matters if you actually want to talk about international law rather than just throwing around emotionally charged terms.
Do you have any actual legal basis for your definition, or are you just making it up as you go?
Elite dangerous, you end up with spreadsheets fetching data from online sources if you go wild
DayZ everyone uses interactive map and it’s a good game for anyone with time to kill and some gluttony for punishment. I do need to add: “Players often describe DayZ as a psychological horror or “psychosis simulator” due to the extreme paranoia and auditory hallucinations of solo survival. In the r/DayZ subreddit, survivors frequently share stories of constantly misinterpreting wind and ambient environmental noises for distant player footsteps or enemy gunfire”
Project zomboid is really cool if you print out the world map