It was NASDAQ100 that let SpaceX in. S&P 500 stayed true to their rules which includes waiting at least 1 year after IPO to include it in the portfolio
Sir. Haxalot
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoTechnology@lemmy.world•SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a monthEnglish5·4 hours ago
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoGames@lemmy.world•After laying off thousands, Ubisoft says losing "key talents and skills" is a big danger for the companyEnglish40·5 days ago
Ubisoft stock has lost 90% of its value the past 5 years though, so I don’t think the shareholders are fans.
Which makes it even more insane that they haven’t realized that it’s time to take a step back and evaluate their strategy, but I guess there’s a point that they are extremely out of touch with reality.
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Most slopcode projects are abandoned and deleted within months of releaseEnglish151·11 days ago
I would guess that the key difference is that vibe coded apps can get to a more or less working state a lot quicker, while other apps are likely to be abandoned before it’s done.
Though in either case I’d always be careful with new projects. If it’s just a single guy that’s been working on something for less than a year and only have a handful of GitHub stars, I probably wouldn’t install it.
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk Is Charging Starlink Customers Gigantic Bogus Fees Because Its Network Is Being Crushed by “High Demand”English6·13 days ago
That would be a reasonable expectation, but I want to remember this being talked about as a revolution for internet in the US; how much better it would be compared to shitty cable providers and how you would get Gigabit speeds without having to run fibre.
Sure, it looked impressive early on, but a wireless system like this will always degrade the more customers they get.
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk Is Charging Starlink Customers Gigantic Bogus Fees Because Its Network Is Being Crushed by “High Demand”English421·13 days ago
To be fair, the network being crushed by high demand is extremely unsurprising. Cellular networks have always had this problem in dense areas, where it’s no way you’re reaching the advertised speed. This is mainly due to the available channels being shared by everyone in a relatively large area, connected to the same cell. Which is mitigated somewhat by setting up more cells with shorter range for a higher cell density in cities.
How could a satellite based network ever scale? Where you have what, a handful available cells to cover an entire state?
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk Is Charging Starlink Customers Gigantic Bogus Fees Because Its Network Is Being Crushed by “High Demand”English4·13 days ago
That doesn’t make much sense, how is a completely different infrastructure going to help their capacity issues? Unless the plan is to pivot from satellite to 5G or something
- Sir. Haxalot@nord.pubtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AMD silently removes memory encryption from consumer Ryzen CPUs, leaving users unaware that they may be vulnerableEnglish1·1 month ago
Hold up, since when did consumer Ryzen CPUs have memory encryption support? I was sure that was always a EPYC exclusive feature.
Shorting the stock and making money on your own when Musk fails
(This is not financial advice. In fact it’s very dangerous as Musks companies often perform irrationally)