At that point though cord cutting en-mass was already beginning so it wasn’t even a big draw
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.workstoTechnology@lemmy.world•Sony Abandons Social Media for 24 Hours+ After Controversially Killing Physical GamesEnglish1·7 days ago
- Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.workstoGames@lemmy.world•If Steam were to shut down tomorrow how much money would you have lost in total on games / DLC ??English5·9 days ago
Total spend says 12k, not bad for 15 years considering how often I buy games for my friends lol
- Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.workstoPC Master Race@lemmy.world•Steam Machine User Faces First Case of Red Line of Death “RLOD” On His Unit Just 20 Minutes In, Indicating a GPU FailureEnglish61·9 days ago
How exactly did you come to that conclusion?
Extremely conservative/risk averse and slow to implement basically anything new, unless it’s super flashy like AI lol
This is really cool in theory, I doubt my corp would let me use it though :(
ChatGPT 5.6: (Is fat32 a good option for a 64gb external drive) FAT32 is suitable for a 64 GB external drive only when maximum compatibility is the priority.
The main limitation is that individual files cannot exceed 4 GB. That makes FAT32 unsuitable for large videos, disk images, backups, or many game files.
Better choices:
exFAT: Best general-purpose option for Windows, macOS, Linux, TVs, consoles, and other modern devices. Supports files larger than 4 GB.
NTFS: Better for a Windows-focused drive, permissions, and reliability, but has weaker write support on some non-Windows devices.
ext4: Best for Linux-only use, but Windows and macOS do not support it natively.
FAT32: Use mainly for older hardware, firmware updates, boot media, or devices that specifically require FAT32.
For a normal 64 GB external drive, I would format it as exFAT unless the device you plan to connect it to explicitly requires FAT32.
Local hardware Gemma-4-12b: (Is fat32 a good option for a 64gb external drive) For a 64GB external drive, ExFAT is usually a better choice than FAT32.
Here is why:
The 4GB File Limit
The biggest issue with FAT32 is that a single file cannot exceed 4GB. While a 64GB drive can easily hold many thousands of small documents and photos, modern media files (high-definition videos, disk images, or large installer files) often exceed that limit. If you try to copy a 5GB file onto a FAT32 formatted drive, the copy will fail even though the drive is mostly empty.
The Solution: ExFAT
ExFAT was designed specifically for flash memory (thumb drives, SD cards, external drives). It keeps the high compatibility that makes FAT32 popular — it still works on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and PlayStation — but removes the file size ceiling, allowing files of virtually any size.
Summary Recommendation