Great. What are you all going to do about the policies he changed?
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
- Darcranium@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Wikimedia Foundation refuses voluntary union recognition, hires union-busting law firmEnglish1·24 days ago
Perfect timing. I just started donating to a new startup (comingle) that seems as promising as Wikipedia once was. Nonprofit whose goal is to start their own universal basic income for users who don’t want to wait for the government to start one. Now I can cancel my Wikipedia donations and not feel so bad
- Darcranium@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Wikimedia Foundation refuses voluntary union recognition, hires union-busting law firmEnglish203·24 days ago
Perfect timing. I just started donating to a new startup that seems as promising as Wikipedia once was. Nonprofit whose goal is to start their own universal basic income for users who don’t want to wait for the government to start one. Now I can cancel my Wikipedia donations and not feel so bad
- Darcranium@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Reddit stock tumbles the most on record as lack of new AI deals, US daily users metric disappointsEnglish16·26 days ago
You love to see it
- Darcranium@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Saying white people food tastes plain isn't the same as calling the cops on a black teen56·29 days ago
I think you mean you are being a prescriptivist. In a descriptivist action, they added the new definition to Merriam Webster like 2 years ago. This is because they decided it makes sense to have a different and more useful definition of “racism” and “racial prejudice.”
the purpose of refining the racism definition as “power + prejudice” was to move discourse away from the idea of being racist as a personal failing, and instead focus on structural oppression and the material reality of minority groups.
Basically liberal society largely seems to have conceived racism as ‘being irrationally mean’, but for people with a materialist anti-racist perspective, that definition isn’t productive or insightful and the lack of material, tangible progress for black people post-civil rights made it clear that there needed to be more focus on power dynamics and historical context to combat racism.
I’d recomend Beverly Tatum’s work , her perspective is very informed and compelling
- Darcranium@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Saying white people food tastes plain isn't the same as calling the cops on a black teen109·29 days ago
This argument has been going on for 60 years, by historians and educators, black and white, who are much smarter than us… Here’s a reddit comment I found that detailed the argument well (paraphrasing)
the purpose of “power + prejudice” was to move discourse away from the idea of being racist as a personal failing, and instead focus on structural oppression and the material reality of minority groups.
Basically liberal society largely seems to have conceived racism as ‘being irrationally mean’, but for people with a materialist anti-racist perspective, that definition isn’t productive or insightful and the lack of material, tangible progress for black people post-civil rights made it clear that there needed to be more focus on power dynamics and historical context to combat racism.
Beverly Tatum’s work offers an informed and compelling perspective on the matter
Haha ok ok my bad it’s called comingle and i think it’s still in beta phase for another month…
https://www.comingle.us/