I am referring to generative models trained to take an image and output a chromakey’d image with some minor hair and transparency improvements. The lines are kinda blurred between classified and generated here but it is “generative AI”.

I think we just all agree text-to-image/video is bad and not creative at all. I just have this strong feeling that these directors have access to real experts and tools so I give them the benefit of the doubt rather than fediverse members, by a huge fucking margin. (E: but not George L)

Are you not aware of the AI assisted greenscreen tools? No well they are helpful and make the job faster.

CGI is one of the places where AI has been used for years. People were happy enough using generative AI before chatbots why stop now? I think the de-aging stuff is a pretty cool storytelling tool and the greenscreen filters save a lot of time and add quality.

Wonder how George will fuck it up will he use a movie generator?

You just make a few channels on existing IRC servers don’t need to host anything. I mean if you know what you are doing go for it but unless you actually do, don’t put servers on the internet for trawlers to take over.

A fediverse IRC server network sounds pretty cool tbh. #bringbackirc

E: Oooo a middle ground: https://thelounge.chat/ Self Hosted IRC WebClient

Here is some advice then: Don’t run a public service until you understand the risks and are capable of protecting yourself and your users. It isn’t as simple as booting up a service for self use. By using Discord they minimised damages to users it would be worse if they lost control of a Discord alternative with RCE exploits.

Self hosting and providing a public service are two very different things.

“They” is you. Stop waiting for someone else to fight. Sacrifice your freedom start a trend.

You opened accusing me of a fallacy then doing that same fallacy you get what you pay for.

Buddy I conflated you with everyone else, your tribe. I am not going to study you and write you a personal essay get the fuck over yourself. You were part of the crowd take responsibility for being associated with them. And you’re switching shit around I am just going to ignore that you loser.

you very desperately need to be a martyr, and that you need to see yourself as a champion for science

I eye fucked your intellectual identity and you took 10 hours to think of something this was it. I get it, it sounded big in your head but it’s a little too big, I am arguing against you on lemmy lol

No not really. Two of the same thing can be made by the same company by the same staff and one be completely crap and one is perfectly crafted. They just sell the stuff that didn’t make it pass quality control and then they keep producing the product after they start to run out of proper materials and will begin to use what they can get their hands on. Temu makeup ftw

nobody in this thread made that argument, nor defended it, nor defended any other commenters who did

Liar everyone in this thread made that argument including you it was the first thing you said. Apply that same logic to putting telescopes in space they aren’t exactly the most efficient cost effective forms of science shit is difficult. Your entire reasoning that it is not cost effective and is difficult is anti-science. If you weren’t being a tribalistic asshole you wouldn’t care but because the AI is against your tribe and AI also happens to need datacenters you do care. I cared long before AI fuck you.

Maybe you are under some impression that data is hoarded and not triaged. Onsite processing would be a leap in technology.

They aren’t price gouging rural internet subscribers it’s the opposite they get half priced subscriptions for as long as they keep them. It is the people who try to sign up that already live in a congested area that get fuck off prices. You can sign up and get a rural deal and then move to a congested area with fuckoff pricing. That is what I did inadvertently.

What? No, they serve two totally different purposes and have significantly different requirements.

We don’t have eyeglasses on space based telescope guy there is no human up there looking through the telescope and writing down what they are finding.

Mine? Or “your” as in all of us on lemmy, which includes you? Again, nobody in this thread made that argument, nor defended it, nor defended any other commenters who did - and you’re still acting like a complete dick about it.

Yes YOUR tribalistic bullshit. You lying dog that is what this whole thread has been about it isn’t my fault you didn’t realise you were assaulting real science with your tribalism.

Advocating for no.

You’re frustrated by “people all over lemmy screaming that because there’s no air in space datacenters won’t work up there.”

Yep.

Consider this: Do all the reasons for not putting a datacenter in space also apply to not putting a big ass telescope in space?

If you can justify putting up an expensive telescope into space than you can also justify sending some high performance computing up there to process the sensor data on site. If you want to call your cluster of computers a datacenter go for it.

If you think datacenters in space are a bad idea for AI and other services here on Earth well then you’d obviously be right but if you think it is because of no air yea we are back to square one ima call you a fuckwit.

Now if you believe most space exploration is a waste of money and is just used for weapons development that would be noble, but still it’s not a bad idea because there is no air in space. No one has used this argument just the air in space and expensive ones.

I am not advocating anything for I am just not letting your draconian tribalistic bullshit peer pressure into agreeing with dumbass shit spill over onto science without some pushback.

One way is just by making something hot. It will radiate heat energy into space without convection. But I am not here trying to design a space computer I am here to piss on internet tribalism.

How are you going to mention strawman argument and then go on to say

and therefore it’s fine to just put data centers in space?

Do you want genuine engagement was this an error on your part or are you trying to troll or make a joke or something?

If I am moving the goalposts it is because I am moving them back. Nice try you anti-science asshole.

This is what I said 15 hours ago it is unedited…

The AI hate train is trying to hold back high performance computing from processing sensor data and streaming it back to earth.

You are just pathetic. You don’t get to tell me what I am talking about so you can feel better about yourself you rot.

Every accusation is a confession with you dude, and so you absolutely should feel personally attacked by me. Because I am not going to engage you genuinely, for obvious reasons. Bitch ass anti-science republican clown.

Air & water are not the only things that can cool a computer down in space. We want faster more powerful computers in space to process telescope data before streaming it back to earth because the limits are bandwidth and computing we can already send big camera sensors up there. The AI hate fad is catching strays. Some of our more amazing data is from longform surveys taken from the ground where the data is stored in, you guessed it, a datacenter.

You can’t read, or assume everyone else’s motives poorly

You know what is wrong you just said it, but then you proceed to do that exact thing.

Or you do something, someone does it back and you cry like a bitch. Very republican of you.