All that an AI has to do to disprove that claim is pay someone to weigh one orange through fivr. So either your claim is wrong, or LLMs as they exist now are no longer statistical models. Go ahead and move the goal post if you want, my complaint was about your overly broad claim.
You’re allowed to censor other people if you want to, just as other people are allowed to mock you for doing so.
Ranting at people like a 12 year old on Xbox who just learned to swear does not sell the “I’m more mature” image all that well.
You’re bitching at people like a child because they don’t talk the way you want and acting like you’re the exception. You sound like a squeaker on COD.
I’m not sure why you should decide how other people are allowed to speak. Could you explain where your moral authority originated?
Because the bad products are claiming to be good. It’s a poisoned product category.
A bidet is a safer option, and cheaper in the long term.
I picked the way in which an AI model (as the exist now) could most trivially produce a piece of novel (and deliberately trivial) information.
I wasn’t worried about whether the credit could fairly be attributed to it. We’re talking about whether they can produce information with which to grow their knowledge. Moral credit for the growth of their knowledge is outside the scope of the discussion.