That’s if you can prove harassment or stalking.

both of which have been widely documented already.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/pranksters-and-pickup-artists-are-using-meta-ray-ban-glasses-to-harass-strangers-for-content/ar-AA1ULEhi

https://nypost.com/2026/04/14/business/metas-pervert-glasses-fuel-trend-of-creeps-filming-women-posting-videos-online/

If someone’s just keeping their camera running all the time in public, that’s just recording in public, which in most of the US is unfortunately legal.

if someone’s doing that, I generally don’t have a problem, it’s the upskirt / down shirt / in faces / provoking for likes garbage that needs to be hit hard, and the easiest way to stop it all will be sensible regulation of this shitty tech.

It’s hardly just norway: https://www.politico.eu/article/meta-ai-glasses-face-criminal-complaint-in-germany/

https://petapixel.com/2026/08/04/meta-smart-glasses-face-calls-for-bans-across-europe-over-privacy-concerns/

and, it doesn’t have to be nations - https://www.gadgetreview.com/metas-smart-glasses-are-being-banned-across-the-uk

private businesses can and should protect their customers right to shop without assholes.

MATE, YOU DON’T HAVE TO ACCEPT THIS. IT’S OK TO SAY NO TO CREEPS.