Home Possession of AI-Generated Porn Depicting Fake Children Remains Constitutionally Protected, Seventh Circuit Rules
reason.com
From U.S. v. Anderegg, decided Tuesday by Seventh Circuit Judge John Lee, joined by Judges Doris Pryor and Joshua Kolar:...
  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.worldEnglish
    191·
    13 days ago

    That’s not how AI works. The people claiming that AI models have to be trained on CP to make CP have a fundamental misunderstanding of how image generation models work.

    If I ask an AI model to make an image of a sexy air fryer fucking a sexy, anthropomorphic, ear of corn, it will produce said image. I promise it was not trained on sexy images of air fryers fucking sexy anthropomorphic ears of corn.

    That’s what makes AI so dangerous and difficult to regulate. We are not ready for this technology to be in the hands of everyone.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      13 days ago

      They’re not wrong about the ruling incentivising CP though. I’m sure we’ll see shitloads of sites outright advertising it now

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.worldEnglish
      23·
      13 days ago

      You’re wrong. Literally from the article

      AI-generated CSAM may also present other challenges not raised by the government in this appeal. For example, researchers have found that “a major dataset used for training image-generating AI contained hundreds of CSAM images.” Thus, unlike the virtual CSAM at issue in Free Speech Coalition, the market for AI-generated virtual CSAM images may impact the demand for actual CSAM on which the AI models can train.

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.mlEnglish
        21·
        13 days ago

        So get rid of that dataset, you’ll still have systems that can generate similar images anyway. If it can generate images of things that do not and cannot exist in reality then it can generate CSAM without using real CSAM.