Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
I just said this in another post. But most people, including on the left, have reservations about biological males in women’s sports. And it is not an issue that isn’t “statistically relevant,” but even offering that as a reason why it is okay means it is only okay because just a few women and girls are impacted.
And the issue isn’t even thought through. It makes as much sense to divide sports by gender identity as it would by dividing sports by sexual orientation. What do either of these “internal states” have to do with sports performance?
Trans people are not robots, we are all biological. The term you are looking for is trans women in women’s sport.
No, because I am also referencing girls sports. And those who don’t identify as “trans” such as “non-binary” etc. And “biological males” refers to males-by-biology, which now has to be specified as there is no other word that correlates to biological sex.
Non-binary people are still trans, they are not a right wing dog whistle/slur of “biological male”.
I tried giving you the benefit of the doubt, but your 20hr old account post history is so full of “Soft” ant-trans rhetoric that what you are is telling.
if nonbinary people aren’t trans then why is there a trans flag on my wall, huh? checkmate! *drops mic* *vine boom* *puts on sunglasses* *explosions* *Bruh Sound Effect #2*
Buddy, gas and eggs are $5; ain’t nobody give a fuck about a minuscule amount of people winning 4th place in a swim meet.
But what if they tied for 5th place? I think that might be a pretty big deal, actually.