Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
I fully understand. But on the other hand, I really don’t like the, please pardon the word, sob-story approach chosen by the Guardian here. Not because it isn’t sad what happened to her, just to make that clear. But because the whole angle seems designed to deviate from the fact that they simply did not sort out their affairs for years. In a prolonged careless manner that wouldn’t be acceptable for neither you nor me or anyone else.
I.a. her son, who according to the article also lives in Sweden with his family. Or the other son who lives in the UK and hence at least should be very much aware on what was happening since 2016. We’re not talking about a situation that suddenly surfaced in 2023, when her husband was gravely ill, but about a situation that developed since 2016.
Trust me, no need to tell me. Lost a very close family member some months ago and I know only too well how you’re suddenly supposed to handle grief and overwhelming administrative formalities at the same time, with the latter not showing any sign of consideration for the special situation you’re suddenly in. On the other hand, at the risk of again coming across as callous, Brexit was ten years ago. It honestly is beyond me how no-one in that family (not even the sons) at one point thought of the inevitable consequences.
I think they looked for instructions and were convinced that they already had sorted out everything, and possibly had good reasons to think so. In 2022 (before the husband’s death), they learned for the first time that this wasn’t the case, and it sounds like they turned in the paperwork immediately afterwards.