Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
If a pilot of a plane told me that they catch any critical errors they make 89% of the time, I would NOT get on that fucking plane.
Anthropic or not, the recent streak of supply chain and also targeted attacks got me packing into VM.
Now I run all devtools and install packages only inside the VM and either connect Zed / VSCode via ssh or run terminal ide inside the VM.
No host mounts whatsoever, all communication Host to Guest strictly through git.
Yeah but if I were buying cheap corn and they said 89% of the ears were good, I would still buy the corn. So is AI airplanes or corn?
That’s not entirely the same thing. It says it catches 89% of HARMFUL actions. That means that 11% of the time it doesn’t.
That’s more like if the corn had a parasite on it that could give you explosive diarrhea 11% of the time. Would you still eat the corn?
Also, in my example, I didn’t say the harmful actions of the pilot resulted in a crash. However, that doesn’t mean it couldn’t. How many of those 11% of the time are the “woops I deleted the production database” stories we hear all the time?
But if I was buying a bottle of water and they said 11% of the water might be contaminated, I’m not buying it. Same for corn, actually. In fact, if they know only 11% of the ears are bad, they should be able to tell me how they’re bad. If they can’t, then they really mean “untested” and that’s a no go from me.