The European Commission is preparing a serious warning to Spain for its limited progress in the fight against corruption. The draft 2026 Rule of Law Report, whose official publication is scheduled for this Friday, calls for accelerating pending reforms and strengthening the bodies responsible for monitoring, investigating, and sanctioning irregularities.

The report reflects that nine out of ten Spaniards believe that corruption is widespread in the country. Social perception has worsened over the last five years and places Spain in 17th place among community partners and 49th in the world ranking.

The concern has also spread to companies that work with administrations. Four out of ten companies participating in public tenders believe that corruption has prevented them from securing a contract during the last three years, ten points above the European average.

Brussels also detects a rapid deterioration of business confidence in the functioning of awards. The percentage of companies that consider the Spanish public procurement system independent has fallen from 61% to 44% in just one year.

Public procurement continues to be for Brussels a “high-risk area for corruption”. 34% of Spanish tenders receive a single bid, compared to the 28% registered as the average in the European Union, a difference that limits competition and increases the risks of irregularities.

The Anti-Corruption Plan advances too slowly

The European Commission acknowledges the approval of the State Plan against Corruption announced by Pedro Sánchez in the summer of 2025, after the investigation of the Koldo case reached the then Secretary of Organization of the [ruling Socialist party] PSOE, Santos Cerdán.

The plan includes measures in five main areas: the prevention of irregularities, the strengthening of controls, the protection of whistleblowers and informants, the recovery of assets from crimes, and the increase of transparency and citizen participation. Brussels considers its approval positive, but calls for faster execution and verifiable results.

The Community Executive also analyzes the Public Integrity Bill, which proposes grouping the Office of Conflicts of Interest, the Independent Authority for the Protection of Informants, and a future National Anti-Fraud Agency. The intention is to bring together in a single body the competencies currently dispersed among different institutions.

For Brussels, this future supervisor will have to have true independence and sufficient powers to investigate and impose sanctions. A formal structure without budget, personnel, or executive capacity would be insufficient given the volume and complexity of the irregularities detected.

No real progress in lobby regulation

Spain also continues without approving a complete regulation of interest groups … The Independent Authority for the Protection of Whistleblowers has also not managed to fill its entire staff despite the increase in work. Since September 2025, it has received around 400 complaints, while its budgetary limitations hinder the management and protection of those who report possible irregularities. Brussels asks to guarantee the necessary resources to prevent complaints from getting caught in administrative delays.

Major corruption cases continue to last too long

The duration of high-level corruption proceedings once again appears among the main community concerns. Cases such as Gürtel, Púnica, Lezo, or Kitchen remain open or awaiting definitive resolutions more than a decade after their investigations began.

During 2025, 19 new corruption cases were opened at the state and autonomous community levels. Of the 76 procedures analyzed, 52 ended with convictions and 19 concluded with acquittals, according to the data collected in the draft.

Meanwhile, a Spanish court said Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s wife Begona Gomez would face trial for alleged influence peddling and embezzlement, dashing her final hope of avoiding the dock.

Archived

    • mjr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Germany is led by EPP members, isn’t it? So the EPP-led Commission isn’t going to do that. They want to help get PES out of Spain’s government.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Did we already forget about eu commission / parliament corruption scandal :-)?

      • endofline@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        This one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar_corruption_scandal_at_the_European_Parliament

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Kaili

        From brave search

        Eva Kaili: A Greek MEP and former Vice-President of the European Parliament, who was arrested in December 2022; she denies all charges. Pier Antonio Panzeri: A former Italian MEP identified as the network’s leader, who confessed to the crimes and struck a plea deal to cooperate with prosecutors. Francesco Giorgi: Kaili’s partner and a parliamentary assistant, who admitted his role in handling illicit funds before being released under electronic monitoring. Andrea Cozzolino and Marc Tarabella: Italian and Belgian MEPs, respectively, who were arrested and charged in early 2023; both deny wrongdoing. Niccolò Figà-Talamanca: Head of the NGO No Peace Without Justice, who denies the charges against him. Marie Arena: A former Belgian MEP charged in early 2025 with belonging to a criminal organization, which she denies.

        • tardigrade@scribe.disroot.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Let us not forget the Huawei bribery case. Corruption is everywhere, but at least the Belgian police made a series of arrests in a probe into suspected corruption on behalf of the Chinese tech giant. Spain, however, remains behind as, amongst others, corruption cases take too long due to insufficient staffing and budget.

          Not to forget that Spain’s PM Pedro Sanchez banned Huawei from its public network, but contracted the Chinese company for its judicial wiretap system (I wonder why).

          In addition, the PM and its allies are deeply involved in a number of corruption cases in the country. This is what the article is about.

          @u/mjr@infosec.pub

          • mjr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Isn’t that another MEP-based scandal, not involving the Commission? And, as you say, at least there have been arrests.

        • mjr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          ewww, Brave.

          But anyway, that looks like more PES MEPs (or S&D, to use the modern name). Where’s the Commission involvement?