Dieser Bereich kann Inhalte enthalten, die nicht für alle Nutzer geeignet sind. Dazu können unter anderem Texte, Medien oder Diskussionen gehören, die als beleidigend, extremistisch, gewaltbezogen oder anderweitig belastend empfunden werden. Wenn du solche Inhalte nicht sehen möchtest, nutze bitte die jeweiligen Filter- und Meldeoptionen der Plattform oder meide entsprechende Threads/Communities.
No, he never said he would only run one term. Anonymous people said that they thought he would, and when journalists immediately asked the Biden campaign they denied it. For some reason people take as gospel what anonymous people thought someone else would do.
Nope. In 2024, Biden himself confirmed it:
How do you get a one term promise out of any of that? Whether he runs one term or two terms he would still be handing things off to younger politicians. It’s almost tautological considering how old he was.
What else could he possibly mean by that, especially when he’s discussing in retrospect and openly acknowledging it? Seems awfully obtuse. But here, let me try spelling it out just a bit more, and beyond that I’m done trying:
Your references to 2019 are irrelevant. It was already reported by Politico that four people speaking regularly with VP Biden had privately told the mhe was unlikely to run for reelection in 2024 – this was likely to assuage concerns of liability for his age when that time came.
There was a particularly famous press conference Q&A of his, July 11, 2024.
The report asks, “in 2020 you referred yourself as being a ‘bridge candidate for a younger, fresher generation of Democratic leaders’ and I wanted to know what changed”
Biden’s response, in acknowledgement stated, “What changed was…[reasons]… and I want to get that finished.”
Naturally, if using the tiniest bit of logic, you can surmise two things:
(1) If “bridge” candidate doesn’t mean that, then he could’ve and would’ve simply said, “I still intend to be a bridge candidate, after two terms, which was always the plan!” – never did he say this.
(2) He concluded answering the question that he needed more time, implying he wanted his second term in order, “to get that finished.”
If you’re still not connecting the dots then I don’t know what to tell you and I’ll just chalk this up to either willful ignorance or rage-bait.
The Politico article quoted several anonymous people and in it they only shared their personal opinion and not anything that Biden said. So your description of that article is wrong, you are lying.
I’ll provide quotes:
Anonymous personal opinion.
Anonymous personal opinion.
Anonymous personal opinion.
But none of these are relevant, because shortly after the campaign responded:
Not anonymous and an official statement from the campaign.
So I repeat myself: