Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is directly asking Sen. Mitch McConnell, the state’s most powerful figure in Congress, to disclose more about his condition after three weeks of silence from the 84-year-old since he was hospitalized in Washington.

The letter released Wednesday from Beshear, a Democrat who is considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, to the former Senate Republican leader says “Kentuckians have grown increasingly concerned about the current state of your health and well-being, and ability to hold office.”

McConnell, whose physical condition has visibly declined in recent years, was hospitalized June 14. He has not released a public statement, photos or videos since. Aides have disclosed nothing specific about his condition, other than to say last week that McConnell “continues to improve, and is working closely with his staff on Kentucky and Senate matters while the Senate is out of session.”

That lack of detail has fueled rampant speculation about his prognosis and whether he will return to the Senate when it reconvenes next week. The firestorm was enough that Republican Senate leaders on Tuesday made public statements saying they had talked to McConnell and that he was alert and discussing current events.

McConnell is retiring at the end of his term in January, and the campaign to elect his successor already is underway. Kentucky’s Senate succession law, which Republican legislators have twice changed during Beshear’s tenure, does not give the governor a role in picking a temporary successor should McConnell’s seat become vacant before his term ends.

Under the latest change in 2024, if the seat becomes vacant before Aug. 3, there would be a special election to pick a replacement, perhaps held concurrently with the general election in November. The special election winner could take office nearly immediately. The general election winner would be sworn in as part of the new Congress in January.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    In the U.S. the difference is whether or not the hospital has permission from the patient.

    If the patient has not given permission for the information to be released, then the hospital isn’t allowed to release it. There’s no gray area there.

    I’m not sticking up for special treatment for criminals and traitors. I’m saying that everyone gets to say what information is released about their healthcare. As it should be.

    For actual criminals, the police can get a warrant to get information.

    And yes, a journalist can try to get information, and the hospital has a responsibility to do everything they can to prevent that.

    The question was:

    What is stopping him or a democratic senator from going to the hospital with a camera and finding out for themselves.

    And my answer was the hospital. Because the hospital has a responsibility to protect the privacy of all their patients.