WaPo reported that Racicot texted Platner that she needed a glute massage to which he understood as an invitation and replied that he would come over. She later changed her mind and told him not to come over. Politico never included this detail in their article and since they were the first to break the story, most people were not aware of this detail.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    The summary paragraph attributed to you does not include any skepticism about this obvious attempt at victim blaming.

    Spreading this sort of bullshit is what I’ll blame if Platner stays in and loses. He needs to drop out, now, and find a way to make amends and help the cause. Such as throwing his weight behind the most progressive candidate to replace him on the ballot.

    (Unless he really is the shallow pseudo-leftist misandrist lefties clocked him as at first recollection of that damn tattoo.)

    • yonderbarn@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I am not victim blaming with this post and the video itself does not do that. I too believe he should drop out and I’ve heard that he will announce today.

      • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        I didn’t intend to accuse you of victim blaming.

        I’m accusing the video of doing that, and you of failing to identify it as such in either your summary or a top-level comment.

          • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Does the video do more than note the thing about asking for a massage?

            Because that’s not a relevant fact whose omission is any sin of journalism, and if that’s all they have then releasing a YouTube video with that headline is absolutely victim blaming, even if indirectly.

            The only appropriate rebuttal to a claim of sexual assault is a refutation of the facts claimed, ideally with a horrified “people who cross this line suck” commentary.

            No set of external facts matters if you touch someone in a sexual fashion without their contemporaneous consent. Assertions of external facts existing even being noteworthy is vicirm blaming and helps rapists get away with it.

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Most people aren’t going to watch the video, they’re going to react to the title unfortunately. Since you didn’t clarify that this doesn’t change anything in the body of the post, it really does look like you’re casting aspersions. Thanks for clarifying that you aren’t.